The Effects of Cognitive-Based Interventions in Older Adults Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
作者
Yun, Sunweon [1 ]
Ryu, Seang [1 ]
机构
[1] Mokpo Natl Univ, Dept Nursing, Jeollanamdo, South Korea
关键词
Older adults; Cognitive; Education; Rehabilitation; Systematic review; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; IMPAIRMENT; REHABILITATION; STIMULATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Cognitive -based intervention is divided into three types: Cognitive Stimulation (CS), Cognitive Training (CT), and Cognitive Rehabilitation (CR). This study was conducted to identify systematically the effects of cognitive -based interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) applied to older adults in the following three groups: cognitively healthy, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia. Methods: This search was carried out using the Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Korea databases. The effectiveness of the intervention was verified using the CMA 2.0 program. Results: A total of 54 RCTs were included in systematic reviews and 38 studies were analyzed by meta -analysis. Meta-analysis showed that cognitive -based interventions were effective in improving the cognitive function (SMD=0.39, 95% CI=0.32-0.44) of older adults. The subgroup analysis of cognitive function revealed that CT was the most effective in the cognitively healthy (SMD=0.40, 95% CI=0.33-0.46) and the MCI (SMD=0.45, 95% CI=0.27-0.63) groups, and CS was the most effective in the dementia group (SMD=0.57, 95% CI=0.43-0.70). Conclusion: In order to improve the cognitive function of older adults in each group, the most effective intervention type needs to be considered first. Evidence on the appropriate type of Cognitive -based intervention will be helpful in nursing practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, HLTH WELFARE POLICY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB 2.0)
[3]  
Baik Ok Mi, 2015, [Locality and Globality: Korean Journal of Social Sciences, 지역과 세계], V39, P79
[4]  
Blazer DG, 2003, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V58, P249
[5]   A Risk-Benefit Assessment of Dementia Medications: Systematic Review of the Evidence [J].
Buckley, Jacob S. ;
Salpeter, Shelley R. .
DRUGS & AGING, 2015, 32 (06) :453-467
[6]  
Clare L., 2003, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, pCD003260, DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003260
[7]  
CooperHarris M, 1998, RES SYNTHESIS META A, P167
[8]   Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation [J].
Durlak, Joseph A. ;
DuPre, Emily P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 41 (3-4) :327-350
[9]   Effects of social integration on preserving memory function in a nationally representative US elderly population [J].
Ertel, Karen A. ;
Glymour, M. Maria ;
Berkman, Lisa F. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 98 (07) :1215-1220
[10]   Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Hsu, Wan-Yu ;
Ku, Yixuan ;
Zanto, Theodore P. ;
Gazzaley, Adam .
NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2015, 36 (08) :2348-2359