Perianal fistulas and seton application procedure: is it really safe to use?

被引:0
作者
Cakir, Murat [1 ]
Bicer, Mehmet [1 ]
机构
[1] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Meram Med Fac, Dept Gen Surg, TR-42080 Konya, Turkey
来源
CHIRURGIA-ITALY | 2021年 / 34卷 / 05期
关键词
Fistula; Surgical procedures; operative; Perianal glands; ANAL FISTULA; ANORECTAL ABSCESS; IN-ANO; MULTICENTER; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.23736/S0394-9508.20.05166-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the patients underwent seton placement due to perianal fistula. METHODS: The result of patients diagnosed with perianal fistula and treated with seton method between January 2012 and January 2019 were examined. RESULTS: A total of 312 patients were included in the study. Of all patients, 64 were female and 248 were male. The rate of surgical intervention due to perianal fistula was 25.6%. The rate of seton revision was 12.8%. One seton was applied in 89.7% of the patients, two setons in 5.1% and three setons in 5.1% simultaneously. Partial fistulectomy was performed with seton placement in 64.1% of the patients. The mean duration of follow-up was 36 months in the female and 32 months in the male patients. The mean duration of seton prolapse was 3.96 months. The rate of recurrence was 12.8%, and the rate of incontinence was 7.7%. The rate of full recovery was determined as 80.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Although seton placement is a successful method in the treatment of perianal fistula, its complications are not as low as thought. One of the reasons of high complication rate was that seton application was preferred in complicated patients.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 192
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   The outcome of fistulotomy for anal fistula at 1year: a prospective multicentre French study [J].
Abramowitz, L. ;
Soudan, D. ;
Souffran, M. ;
Bouchard, D. ;
Castinel, A. ;
Suduca, J. M. ;
Staumont, G. ;
Devulder, F. ;
Pigot, F. ;
Ganansia, R. ;
Varastet, M. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (03) :279-285
[2]  
Gonzalez-Ruiz C, 2006, AM SURGEON, V72, P11
[3]   The cryptoglandular theory revisited [J].
Gosselink, Martijn Pieter ;
van Onkelen, Robbert Sebastiaan ;
Schouten, W. R. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (12) :1041-1043
[4]   Outcomes After Operations for Anal Fistula: Results of a Prospective, Multicenter, Regional Study [J].
Hall, Jason F. ;
Bordeianou, Liliana ;
Hyman, Neil ;
Read, Thomas ;
Bartus, Christine ;
Schoetz, David ;
Marcello, Peter W. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (11) :1304-1308
[5]   Outcomes After Fistulotomy: Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Regional Study [J].
Hyman, Neil ;
O'Brien, Sean ;
Osler, Turner .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (12) :2022-2027
[6]   Risk factors for recurrence and incontinence after anal fistula surgery [J].
Jordan, J. ;
Roig, J. V. ;
Garcia-Armengol, J. ;
Garcia-Granero, E. ;
Solana, A. ;
Lledo, S. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (03) :254-260
[7]   The role of loose seton in the management of anal fistula: a multicenter study of 200 patients [J].
Kelly, M. E. ;
Heneghan, H. M. ;
McDermott, F. D. ;
Nason, G. J. ;
Freeman, C. ;
Martin, S. T. ;
Winter, D. C. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 18 (10) :915-919
[8]   Common Anal Problems [J].
Klein, Jared Wilson .
MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 98 (03) :609-+
[9]   Anal endosonography and fistulography for fistula-in-ano [J].
Pomerri, F. ;
Dodi, G. ;
Pintacuda, G. ;
Amadio, L. ;
Muzzio, P. C. .
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2010, 115 (05) :771-783
[10]   Definitive seton management for transsphincteric fistula-in-ano: harm or charm? [J].
Rosen, D. R. ;
Kaiser, A. M. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (05) :488-495