Long-term outcomes of standard endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with severe neck angulation

被引:41
作者
Oliveira, Nelson F. G. [1 ,2 ]
Goncalves, Frederico Bastos [1 ,3 ]
Hoeks, Sanne E. [4 ]
van Rijn, Marie Josee [1 ]
Ultee, Klaas [1 ]
Pinto, Jose Pedro [1 ,5 ]
Ten Raa, Sander [1 ]
van Herwaarden, Joost A. [6 ]
de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M. [7 ]
Verhagen, Hence J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Vasc Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Hosp Divino Espirito Santo, Dept Angiol & Vasc Surg, Ponta Delgada, Azores, Portugal
[4] Ctr Hosp Lisboa Cent, Hosp Santa Marta, Dept Angiol & Vasc Surg, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Hosp Sao Joao, Dept Angiol & Vasc Surg, Porto, Portugal
[6] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Vasc Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
[7] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
关键词
Aortic aneurysm; Abdominal; Blood vessel prosthesis implantation; Severe aortic neck angulation; Long-term follow-up; Endurant stent graft; Retrospective studies; ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM; ENDURANT STENT-GRAFT; HOSTILE; TRIAL; COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTORS; CURVATURE; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.427
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Severe neck angulation is associated with complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Newer endografts may overcome this limitation, but the literature lacks long-term results. We studied the long-term outcomes of EVAR in patients with severe neck angulation. Methods: A retrospective case-control study of a prospective multicenter database was performed. All measurements were made with dedicated software with center lumen line reconstruction. A study group including patients with neck length >15 mm, infrarenal angle (beta) > 75 degrees or suprarenal angle (alpha) > 60 degrees, and neck length 10 to 15 mm with beta > 60 degrees or alpha > 45 degrees was compared with a control group matched for demographics and other morphologic neck features. The primary end point was type IA endoleak (EL1A). Secondary end points were freedom from neck-related secondary interventions, primary clinical success, and overall survival. Results: Forty-five patients were included in the angulated neck group and compared with 65 matched patients. Median follow-up was 7.4 years (interquartile range, 4.8-8.5 years). In the angulated neck group, mean a was 51.4 degrees (+/-21.1 degrees) and the mean beta was 80.8 degrees (+/-15.6 degrees); in the nonangulated group, these were 17.9 degrees (+/-17.0 degrees) and 35.4 degrees (+/-20.0 degrees), respectively. At 7 years, five patients in the angulated neck group and two nonangulated patients developed EL1A, yielding a freedom from EL1A of 86.1% (n = 14; standard error [SE], 0.069) and 96.6% (n = 34; SE, 0.023), respectively (P =.056). After exclusion of a patient who developed an EL1A secondary to an endograft infection, this difference was significant: 86.1% (n = 14; SE, 0.069) in the angulated neck group and 98.2% (n = 34; SE, 0.018) in the nonangulated group (P =.016). At 7 years, freedom from neck-related secondary interventions was 91.7% (n = 14; SE, 0.059) and 91.6% (n = 29; SE, 0.029), respectively. The 7-year primary clinical success estimates were 41.2% (n = 11; SE, 0.085) and 56.6% (n = 20; SE, 0.072) for the angulated neck and nonangulated groups, respectively (P =.12). The 7-year survival rates were 44.3% (n = 18; SE, 0.076) vs 66.7% (n = 42; SE, 0.059) for the angulated neck and nonangulated groups, respectively (P =.25). Device integrity failure was not observed. Conclusions: Despite satisfactory results early and in the midterm, a higher rate of EL1A was identified among patients with severely angulated necks in the long term. However, mortality was not affected by this difference. These findings suggest that EVAR should be used judiciously in patients with extreme angulation of the proximal neck and highlight the need for close follow-up of EVAR, especially in the long term and in patients treated outside instructions for use.
引用
收藏
页码:1725 / 1735
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Long-term outcomes of the Endurant endograft in patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Georgiadis, George S. ;
Schoretsanitis, Nikolaos ;
Argyriou, Christos ;
Nikolopoulos, Evaggelos ;
Kapoulas, Konstantinos ;
Georgakarakos, Efstratios I. ;
Ktenidis, Kyriakos ;
Lazarides, Miltos K. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 78 (03) :668-+
[22]   Long-term Outcomes of a Telementoring Program for Distant Teaching of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair [J].
Porretta, Alessandra Pia ;
Alerci, Mario ;
Wyttenbach, Rolf ;
Antonucci, Francesco ;
Cattaneo, Mattia ;
Bogen, Marcel ;
Toderi, Marco ;
Guerra, Adriano ;
Sartori, Fabio ;
Di Valentino, Marcello ;
Tutta, Paolo ;
Limoni, Costanzo ;
Gallino, Augusto ;
von Segesser, Ludwig K. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2017, 24 (06) :852-858
[23]   Influence of severe neck angulation on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes following endovascular aneurysm repair: a hemodynamic analysis and a retrospective cohort study [J].
Liu Yang ;
Qing Ming ;
Zhao Jichun ;
Huang Bin ;
Yang Yi ;
Zheng Tinghui ;
Yuan Ding .
中华医学杂志英文版, 2022, 135 (21)
[24]   Long Term Outcomes of Post-Implantation Syndrome After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair [J].
Ferreira, Rita Soares ;
Oliveira-Pinto, Jose ;
Ultee, Klaas ;
Voute, Michiel T. ;
Oliveira, Nelson F. G. ;
Hoeks, Sanne ;
Verhagen, Hence J. M. ;
Goncalves, Frederico Bastos .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 62 (04) :561-568
[25]   Postoperative Surveillance and Long-term Outcomes After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Among Medicare Beneficiaries [J].
Garg, Trit ;
Baker, Laurence C. ;
Mell, Matthew W. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (10) :957-963
[26]   Evaluation of Aneurysm Neck Angle Change After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Clinical Investigations [J].
Le, Trong Binh ;
Moon, Mi Hyoung ;
Jeon, Yong Sun ;
Hong, Kee Chun ;
Cho, Soon Gu ;
Park, Keun-Myoung .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 39 (05) :668-675
[27]   A comparison of clinical outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients with favorable and hostile neck angulation treated by endovascular repair with the Treovance stent graft [J].
Murray, David ;
Szeberin, Zoltan ;
Benevento, Domenico ;
Abdallah, Feras ;
Palasciano, Giancarlo ;
Lescan, Mario ;
Uberoi, Raman ;
Setacci, Carlo .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 71 (06) :1881-1889
[28]   Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Hostile Neck Anatomy [J].
Stather, P. W. ;
Sayers, R. D. ;
Cheah, A. ;
Wild, J. B. ;
Bown, M. J. ;
Choke, E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 44 (06) :556-561
[29]   Effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular repair on long-term outcomes between favorable and hostile neck anatomy [J].
Morisaki, Koichi ;
Matsubara, Yutaka ;
Kurose, Shun ;
Yoshino, Shinichiro ;
Furuyama, Tadashi .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 76 (04) :916-922
[30]   Effect of vertebral compression fractures on aortic neck angulation after endovascular aneurysm repair [J].
Shearkhani, Omid ;
Rohringer, Taryn J. ;
Eisenberg, Naomi ;
Mafeld, Sebastian ;
Tan, Kong T. ;
Jaberi, Arash ;
Roche-Nagle, Graham .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (05) :1598-1604