Measurement properties of the 13-item sense of coherence scale using Rasch analysis

被引:30
作者
Holmefur, Marie [1 ,2 ]
Sundberg, Kay [3 ]
Wettergren, Lena [3 ]
Langius-Eklof, Ann [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Orebro, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, S-70182 Orebro, Sweden
[2] Orebro Cty Council, Rehabil Res Ctr, Orebro, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Sense of coherence; Rasch analysis; Outcome measure; Questionnaire; ANTONOVSKYS SENSE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; MAJOR DEPRESSION; STABILITY; LIFE; VALIDITY; VERSION; HEALTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-014-0866-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The sense of coherence (SOC) scale is widely used and has an extensive history in research. The psychometric properties of the SOC scale have been investigated using classic test theory, but modern test theory enables a more multifaceted investigation of the properties of the SOC scale. The aim of this study was to explore the measurement properties of the SOC scale using the Rasch measurement model. SOC questionnaires from a sample of 623 healthy adults were analysed using Rasch analysis. Aspects analysed were rating scale functioning, item fit, unidimensionality, differential item functioning (DIF), targeting, and reliability. Rating scale analysis showed that the seven scale steps were not utilized in the intended manner and that a shortening to five categories would be beneficial. Twelve out of the 13 items showed acceptable goodness-of-fit and 43 % of the variance was explained by the SOC dimension in the principal components analysis. There was no DIF between subgroups in the sample. The items were well targeted to the sample SOC level with no ceiling or floor effects. Item and person reliability were good and the person separation index was 2.05 indicating that the scale can separate three different levels of SOC, which corresponds well to its theoretical base. The SOC scale is generally well functioning; however, the three components of SOC seem to influence the PCA results. The scale would benefit from a reduction from seven to five scale steps, which would need to be investigated further.
引用
收藏
页码:1455 / 1463
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] THE STRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES OF THE SENSE OF COHERENCE SCALE
    ANTONOVSKY, A
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1993, 36 (06) : 725 - 733
  • [2] Antonovsky A., 1987, UNRAVELING MYSTERY H
  • [3] Structure of the sense of coherence scale in a nationally representative sample: the Finnish Health 2000 survey
    Bernabe, Eduardo
    Tsakos, Georgios
    Watt, Richard G.
    Suominen-Taipale, Anna L.
    Uutela, Antti
    Vahtera, Jussi
    Kivimaki, Mika
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (05) : 629 - 636
  • [4] THE DIMENSIONALITY OF ANTONOVSKY'S SENSE OF COHERENCE SCALES. AN INVESTIGATION WITH ITALIAN SAMPLES
    Bonacchi, Andrea
    Miccinesi, Guido
    Galli, Silvia
    Chiesi, Francesca
    Martire, Mariangela
    Guazzini, Monica
    Toccafondi, Alessandro
    Fazzi, Lorenzo
    Balbo, Verena
    Vanni, Duccio
    Rosselli, Massimo
    Primi, Caterina
    [J]. TPM-TESTING PSYCHOMETRICS METHODOLOGY IN APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 19 (02) : 115 - 134
  • [5] Bond TG., 2007, Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, V2nd
  • [6] Büchi S, 1998, J RHEUMATOL, V25, P869
  • [7] Major depression: A breakdown in sense of coherence?
    Carstens, JA
    Spangenberg, JJ
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1997, 80 (03) : 1211 - 1220
  • [8] Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Sense of Coherence Scale in women with cervical cancer
    Ding, Yan
    Bao, Lei-Ping
    Xu, Hao
    Hu, Yan
    Hallberg, Ingalill Rahm
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 21 (11) : 1205 - 1214
  • [9] Validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale:: a systematic review
    Eriksson, M
    Lindström, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2005, 59 (06) : 460 - 466
  • [10] Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale and the relation with health:: a systematic review
    Eriksson, M
    Lindström, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2006, 60 (05) : 376 - 381