Diagnosing writing ability using China's Standards of English Language Ability: Application of cognitive diagnosis models

被引:14
作者
He, Lianzhen [1 ]
Jiang, Ziyun [1 ]
Min, Shangchao [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Appl Linguist, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
关键词
Diagnostic writing assessment; Cognitive diagnosis model; China's Standards of English Language Ability; CAN-DO STATEMENTS; DINA MODEL; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; FIT; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.asw.2021.100565
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Despite the growing interest in diagnostic assessment, few studies have applied cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) to diagnosing writing ability. In this study, a diagnostic checklist was developed using the descriptors of China's Standards of English Language Ability (CSE) and diagnostic results generated by the linear logistic model (LLM) were examined. Based on the descriptive parameters of CSE scales, four attributes were targeted, including grammatical knowledge, textual knowledge, functional knowledge, and sociolinguistic knowledge. The relationship between the descriptors and attributes was specified in a Q-matrix by four domain experts. Writing responses from 460 undergraduates were coded by 15 raters using the diagnostic checklist. Item parameters, attribute prevalence, and common attribute mastery profiles were analyzed. Results showed that examinees' strengths and weaknesses were identified, and the diagnostic results differed across low and high proficiency levels. The practical implications and challenges of using the CDM-based checklist approach were further discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
ACTFL (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages), 2012, ACTFL proficiency guidelines
[2]  
Alderson J., 2005, DIAGNOSING FOREIGN L
[3]  
Alderson J. C., 2005, Language Testing, V22, P301, DOI [DOI 10.1191/0265532205LT310OA, DOI 10.1191/0265532205LT3100A, https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt310oa]
[4]   Towards a Theory of Diagnosis in Second and Foreign Language Assessment: Insights from Professional Practice Across Diverse Fields [J].
Alderson, J. Charles ;
Brunfaut, Tineke ;
Harding, Luke .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2015, 36 (02) :236-260
[5]  
Anderson L.W., 2001, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, DOI DOI 10.7771/1541-5015.1355
[6]   Future directions for assessing for learning in second language writing research: epilogue to the special issue [J].
Aryadoust, Vahid ;
Riazi, Mehdi .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 37 (01) :82-89
[7]  
Bachman L. F., 2010, Language assessment in practice
[8]  
Bachman L.F., 1990, Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing
[9]  
Buck G., 1998, Language Testing, V15, P118, DOI [10.1177/026553229801500201, DOI 10.1177/026553229801500201]
[10]  
Chapelle C.A., 1993, COMMUNICATIVE LANGUA