IoT Adoption and Application for Smart Healthcare: A Systematic Review

被引:62
作者
Al-rawashdeh, Manal [1 ]
Keikhosrokiani, Pantea [1 ]
Belaton, Bahari [1 ]
Alawida, Moatsum [1 ,2 ]
Zwiri, Abdalwhab [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Comp Sci, George Town 11800, Malaysia
[2] Abu Dhabi Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Abu Dhabi 59911, U Arab Emirates
[3] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Dent Sci, Hlth Campus, Kota Baharu 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
关键词
IoT; IoMT; IoT adoption; systematic review; adoption theories; adoption factors; Internet of Things in healthcare; machine learning (ML); deep learning (DL); BIG DATA; INTERNET; THINGS; TECHNOLOGY; COVID-19; INTELLIGENCE; INTENTION; ANALYTICS;
D O I
10.3390/s22145377
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In general, the adoption of IoT applications among end users in healthcare is very low. Healthcare professionals present major challenges to the successful implementation of IoT for providing healthcare services. Many studies have offered important insights into IoT adoption in healthcare. Nevertheless, there is still a need to thoroughly review the effective factors of IoT adoption in a systematic manner. The purpose of this study is to accumulate existing knowledge about the factors that influence medical professionals to adopt IoT applications in the healthcare sector. This study reviews, compiles, analyzes, and systematically synthesizes the relevant data. This review employs both automatic and manual search methods to collect relevant studies from 2015 to 2021. A systematic search of the articles was carried out on nine major scientific databases: Google Scholar, Science Direct, Emerald, Wiley, PubMed, Springer, MDPI, IEEE, and Scopus. A total of 22 articles were selected as per the inclusion criteria. The findings show that TAM, TPB, TRA, and UTAUT theories are the most widely used adoption theories in these studies. Furthermore, the main perceived adoption factors of IoT applications in healthcare at the individual level are: social influence, attitude, and personal inattentiveness. The IoT adoption factors at the technology level are perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, performance expectancy, and effort expectations. In addition, the main factor at the security level is perceived privacy risk. Furthermore, at the health level, the main factors are perceived severity and perceived health risk, respectively. Moreover, financial cost, and facilitating conditions are considered as the main factors at the environmental level. Physicians, patients, and health workers were among the participants who were involved in the included publications. Various types of IoT applications in existing studies are as follows: a wearable device, monitoring devices, rehabilitation devices, telehealth, behavior modification, smart city, and smart home. Most of the studies about IoT adoption were conducted in France and Pakistan in the year 2020. This systematic review identifies the essential factors that enable an understanding of the barriers and possibilities for healthcare providers to implement IoT applications. Finally, the expected influence of COVID-19 on IoT adoption in healthcare was evaluated in this study.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   A Review on the Security of the Internet of Things: Challenges and Solutions [J].
Abiodun, Oludare Isaac ;
Abiodun, Esther Omolara ;
Alawida, Moatsum ;
Alkhawaldeh, Rami S. ;
Arshad, Humaira .
WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 119 (03) :2603-2637
[2]   Comprehensive Review of Artificial Neural Network Applications to Pattern Recognition [J].
Abiodun, Oludare Isaac ;
Jantan, Aman ;
Omolara, Abiodun Esther ;
Dada, Kemi Victoria ;
Umar, Abubakar Malah ;
Linus, Okafor Uchenwa ;
Arshad, Humaira ;
Kazaure, Abdullahi Aminu ;
Gana, Usman ;
Kiru, Muhammad Ubale .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :158820-158846
[3]   State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey [J].
Abiodun, Oludare Isaac ;
Jantan, Aman ;
Omolara, Abiodun Esther ;
Dada, Kemi Victoria ;
Mohamed, Nachaat AbdElatif ;
Arshad, Humaira .
HELIYON, 2018, 4 (11)
[4]   Security in Internet of Things: issues, challenges, taxonomy, and architecture [J].
Adat, Vipindev ;
Gupta, B. B. .
TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 67 (03) :423-441
[5]   The application of internet of things in healthcare: a systematic literature review and classification [J].
Ahmadi, Hossein ;
Arji, Goli ;
Shahmoradi, Leila ;
Safdari, Reza ;
Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh ;
Alizadeh, Mojtaba .
UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2019, 18 (04) :837-869
[6]   Intelligence in the Internet of Medical Things era: A systematic review of current and future trends [J].
Al-Turjman, Fadi ;
Nawaz, Muhammad Hassan ;
Ulusar, Umit Deniz .
COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 150 :644-660
[7]  
Alanazi M, 2019, ENG TECHNOL APPL SCI, V9, P4769
[8]  
Alansari Z., 2017, 2017 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Social Sciences (ICETSS), P1, DOI [DOI 10.1109/ICETSS.2017, 10.1109/ICETSS.2017.8324138, DOI 10.1109/ICETSS.2017.8324138]
[9]   A case-study to examine doctors' intentions to use IoT healthcare devices in Iraq during COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Alhasan, Ameer ;
Audah, Lukman ;
Ibrahim, Ishaq ;
Al-Sharaa, Ammar ;
Al-Ogaili, Ali Saadon ;
M. Mohammed, Jabiry .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 18 (05) :527-547
[10]   The Effect of Security, Privacy, Familiarity, and Trust on User's Attitudes Toward the Use of the IoT-Based Healthcare: The Mediation Role of Risk Perception [J].
Alraja, Mansour Naser ;
Farooque, Murtaza Mohiuddin Junaid ;
Khashab, Basel .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :111341-111354