Why do good people do bad things? The effect of ethical ideology, guilt proneness, and self-control on consumer ethics

被引:16
作者
Arli, Denni [1 ]
Leo, Cheryl [2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Dept Mkt, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Murdoch Univ, Fac Business & Econ, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Australia; Consumer ethics; Self-control; Ethical ideology; Guild proneness; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; THEFT BEHAVIOR; MEDIATING ROLE; SHAME; PERSONALITY; BELIEFS; VALUES; CONSUMPTION; DEPLETION; MORALITY;
D O I
10.1108/APJML-11-2016-0218
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - Various studies showed that unethical behaviours committed by consumers occur more frequently than may be expected. People have stolen from a shop at some time in their life and remained silent, people walk out of a grocery store have stolen something from the store and employees have stolen from their workplace. Why seemingly good people do bad things and vice versa? What factors contribute to this discrepancy? Hence, the purpose of this paper is threefold: first, to examine the impact of ethical ideology on self-control and guilt proneness; second, to examine the roles of self-control and guilt proneness in consumer ethical decision making; and finally, to explore the mediating effects of self-control and guilt proneness on the relationship between consumer ideology and ethical decision making. Design/methodology/approach - The authors collected a non-probability sample using a cross-sectional online survey of adult consumers across Australia wide. The sampling frame was from a pre-recruited online panel company Permissioncorp. Consumers were introduced to the study in relation to their beliefs in general consumer ethics behaviours. The response rate for the survey invite was 17.9 per cent, with a final sample size of 311 consumers out of 3,246 that were invited to participate based on the these screening criteria, i.e. their country of birth (Australia only), gender, age group, and state in which they reside to ensure representation across these groups. Findings - The results showed that idealism was a positive determinant of guilt proneness and self-control, whereas relativistic individuals were less prone to guilt and less able to control their behaviour. In addition, there was a significant negative correlation between self-control and unethical consumer behaviour. Finally, both self-control and guilt proneness had an indirect mediating effect on the relationship between ethical ideology and consumer behaviour. Originality/value - This is one of the first studies to explore the interactions between ethical ideology, self-control, guilt proneness, and consumer ethics.
引用
收藏
页码:1055 / 1078
页数:24
相关论文
共 130 条
[81]   A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996-2003 [J].
O'Fallon, MJ ;
Butterfield, KD .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2005, 59 (04) :375-413
[82]   Anticipated feelings of guilt and shame as predictors of early adolescents' antisocial and prosocial interpersonal behaviour [J].
Olthof, Tjeert .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 9 (03) :371-388
[83]   Religiosity, Attitude Toward Business, and Ethical Beliefs: Hispanic Consumers in the United States [J].
Patwardhan, Abhijit M. ;
Keith, Megan E. ;
Vitell, Scott J. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2012, 110 (01) :61-70
[84]   Consumer ethics in the European Union: A comparison of Northern and Southern views [J].
Polonsky, MJ ;
Brito, PQ ;
Pinto, J ;
Higgs-Kleyn, N .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2001, 31 (02) :117-130
[85]   SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models [J].
Preacher, KJ ;
Hayes, AF .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2004, 36 (04) :717-731
[86]   Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models [J].
Preacher, Kristopher J. ;
Hayes, Andrew F. .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2008, 40 (03) :879-891
[87]   THE SOCIAL DESIRABILITY RESPONSE BIAS IN ETHICS RESEARCH [J].
RANDALL, DM ;
FERNANDES, MF .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1991, 10 (11) :805-817
[88]  
Rawwas M., 1998, J MARKET THEORY PRAC, V6, P26, DOI DOI 10.1080/10696679.1998.11501793
[89]  
Rawwas M.Y. A., 1996, Journal of Direct Marketing, V10, P52
[90]  
Rawwas M. Y. A., 1991, J BUS ETHICS, V10, P151