Why do good people do bad things? The effect of ethical ideology, guilt proneness, and self-control on consumer ethics

被引:16
作者
Arli, Denni [1 ]
Leo, Cheryl [2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Dept Mkt, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Murdoch Univ, Fac Business & Econ, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Australia; Consumer ethics; Self-control; Ethical ideology; Guild proneness; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; THEFT BEHAVIOR; MEDIATING ROLE; SHAME; PERSONALITY; BELIEFS; VALUES; CONSUMPTION; DEPLETION; MORALITY;
D O I
10.1108/APJML-11-2016-0218
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - Various studies showed that unethical behaviours committed by consumers occur more frequently than may be expected. People have stolen from a shop at some time in their life and remained silent, people walk out of a grocery store have stolen something from the store and employees have stolen from their workplace. Why seemingly good people do bad things and vice versa? What factors contribute to this discrepancy? Hence, the purpose of this paper is threefold: first, to examine the impact of ethical ideology on self-control and guilt proneness; second, to examine the roles of self-control and guilt proneness in consumer ethical decision making; and finally, to explore the mediating effects of self-control and guilt proneness on the relationship between consumer ideology and ethical decision making. Design/methodology/approach - The authors collected a non-probability sample using a cross-sectional online survey of adult consumers across Australia wide. The sampling frame was from a pre-recruited online panel company Permissioncorp. Consumers were introduced to the study in relation to their beliefs in general consumer ethics behaviours. The response rate for the survey invite was 17.9 per cent, with a final sample size of 311 consumers out of 3,246 that were invited to participate based on the these screening criteria, i.e. their country of birth (Australia only), gender, age group, and state in which they reside to ensure representation across these groups. Findings - The results showed that idealism was a positive determinant of guilt proneness and self-control, whereas relativistic individuals were less prone to guilt and less able to control their behaviour. In addition, there was a significant negative correlation between self-control and unethical consumer behaviour. Finally, both self-control and guilt proneness had an indirect mediating effect on the relationship between ethical ideology and consumer behaviour. Originality/value - This is one of the first studies to explore the interactions between ethical ideology, self-control, guilt proneness, and consumer ethics.
引用
收藏
页码:1055 / 1078
页数:24
相关论文
共 130 条
[11]   The End of Religion? Examining the Role of Religiousness, Materialism, and Long-Term Orientation on Consumer Ethics in Indonesia [J].
Arli, Denni ;
Tjiptono, Fandy .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2014, 123 (03) :385-400
[12]  
Bagozzi R.P., 1988, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, V16, P74, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1007/BF02723327]
[13]  
Bandalos DL, 2002, J EDUC MEAS, V39, P183
[14]   Framing effects within the ethical decision making process of consumers [J].
Bateman, CR ;
Fraedrich, JP ;
Iyer, R .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2002, 36 (1-2) :119-140
[15]  
Baumeister R. F., 1994, LOSING CONTROL WHY P
[16]   THE NEED TO BELONG - DESIRE FOR INTERPERSONAL ATTACHMENTS AS A FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN-MOTIVATION [J].
BAUMEISTER, RF ;
LEARY, MR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 117 (03) :497-529
[17]   Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior [J].
Baumeister, RF .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2002, 28 (04) :670-676
[18]   ANXIETY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION [J].
BAUMEISTER, RF ;
TICE, DM .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 9 (02) :165-195
[19]   GUILT - AN INTERPERSONAL APPROACH [J].
BAUMEISTER, RF ;
STILLWELL, AM ;
HEATHERTON, TF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1994, 115 (02) :243-267
[20]   Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle [J].
Baumeister, RF ;
Exline, JJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1999, 67 (06) :1165-1194