A belief function theory based approach to combining different representation of uncertainty in prognostics

被引:27
作者
Baraldi, Piero [1 ]
Mangili, Francesca [2 ]
Zio, Enrico [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Energia, Milan, Italy
[2] USI SUPSI, Dalle Molle Inst Artificial Intelligence IDSIA, Lugano, Switzerland
[3] Ecole Cent Paris & Supelec, Fdn EDF, Syst Sci & Energet Challenge, Paris, France
关键词
Prognostics; Uncertainty representation; Belief function theory; Gaussian process regression; Filter clogging; MODEL; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2014.12.051
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this work, we consider two prognostic approaches for the prediction of the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of degrading equipment. The first approach is based on Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and provides the probability distribution of the equipment RUL; the second approach adopts a Similarity-Based Regression (SBR) method for the RUL prediction and belief function theory for modeling the uncertainty on the prediction. The performance of the two approaches is comparable and we propose a method for combining their outcomes in an ensemble. The least commitment principle is adopted to transform the RUL probability density function supplied by the GPR method into a belief density function. Then, the Dempster's rule is used to aggregate the belief assignments provided by the GPR and the SBR approaches. The ensemble method is applied to the problem of predicting the RUL of filters used to clean the sea water entering the condenser of the boiling water reactor (BWR) in a Swedish nuclear power plant. The results by the ensemble method are shown to be more satisfactory than that provided by the individual GPR and SBR approaches from the point of view of the representation of the uncertainty in the RUL prediction. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 149
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]   Investigation of uncertainty treatment capability of model-based and data-driven prognostic methods using simulated data [J].
Baraldi, Piero ;
Mangili, Francesca ;
Zio, Enrico .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 112 :94-108
[12]   A Comparison Between Probabilistic and Dempster-Shafer Theory Approaches to Model Uncertainty Analysis in the Performance Assessment of Radioactive Waste Repositories [J].
Baraldi, Piero ;
Zio, Enrico .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (07) :1139-1156
[13]   Local Fusion of an Ensemble of Models for the Reconstruction of Faulty Signals [J].
Baraldi, Piero ;
Cammi, Antonio ;
Mangili, Francesca ;
Zio, Enrico E. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2010, 57 (02) :793-806
[14]  
Bonissone P., 2008, APPL SOFT COMPUT J, V11, P1529
[15]  
Clemen RT, 2007, ADVANCES IN DECISION ANALYSIS: FROM FOUNDATIONS TO APPLICATIONS, P154, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511611308.010
[16]   Clogging of fibre filters by submicron droplets.: Phenomena and influence of operating conditions [J].
Contal, P ;
Simao, J ;
Thomas, D ;
Frising, T ;
Callé, S ;
Appert-Collin, JC ;
Bémer, D .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2004, 35 (02) :263-278
[17]   UPPER AND LOWER PROBABILITIES INDUCED BY A MULTIVALUED MAPPING [J].
DEMPSTER, AP .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1967, 38 (02) :325-&
[18]  
Goebel K., 2008, 62 M SOC MACH FAIL P, P119
[19]  
Gorjian N., 2009, ENG ASSET LIFECYCLE, P369, DOI [10.1007/978-0-85729-320-642, DOI 10.1007/978-0-85729-320-642]
[20]   Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty [J].
Helton, JC ;
Oberkampf, WL .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 85 (1-3) :1-10