The value of amphotericin B in the treatment of invasive fungal infections

被引:52
作者
Klepser, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Ferris State Univ, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
关键词
Antifungal drugs; Azoles; Echinocandins; Polyenes; Resistance; CELL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; EMPIRICAL ANTIFUNGAL THERAPY; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; CANDIDA-KRUSEI ISOLATE; CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; IN-VITRO; COMPARATIVE EFFICACIES; RECEIVING VORICONAZOLE; COLLOIDAL DISPERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.08.005
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Over the last 20 years, there has been an increase in the total number of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) and in infections caused by rare and emerging pathogens. This is due in part to the growing population of immunocompromised patients at risk of developing fungal infections. Three classes of antifungal agents are widely used for the treatment of systemic fungal infections: polyenes, azoles, and echinocandins. Polyenes were the first antifungal agents developed and have a long-standing history in the treatment of IFIs. The use of conventional amphotericin B has been limited because of toxic side effects, which have been reduced by the lipid formulations of amphotericin B. Treatment options for invasive mycoses have expanded with the recent introduction of the second-generation triazoles (voriconazole and posaconazole) and the echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin). Despite the increased number of antifungal drugs, resistance issues present a problem in the treatment of IFIs. Although some fungal pathogens display innate resistance, others have developed resistance secondary to selective pressure. This article briefly reviews the changing epidemiology of fungal infections and associated risk factors, resistance issues with commonly administered antifungal agents, and treatment options for IFIs, with a focus on polyenes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:225.e1 / 225.e10
页数:10
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]   Antifungal susceptibility profile of clinical Fusarium spp. isolates identified by molecular methods [J].
Alastruey-Izquierdo, Ana ;
Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel ;
Monzon, Araceli ;
Mellado, Emilia ;
Luis Rodriguez-Tudela, Juan .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2008, 61 (04) :805-809
[2]   Candida glabrata fungemia in transplant patients receiving voriconazole after fluconazol [J].
Alexander, BD ;
Schell, WA ;
Miller, JL ;
Long, GD ;
Perfect, JR .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (06) :868-871
[3]   COMPARATIVE EFFICACIES OF AMPHOTERICIN-B, TRIAZOLES, AND COMBINATION OF BOTH AS EXPERIMENTAL-THERAPY FOR MURINE TRICHOSPORONOSIS [J].
ANAISSIE, EJ ;
HACHEM, R ;
KARYOTAKIS, NC ;
GOKASLAN, A ;
DIGNANI, MC ;
STEPHENS, LC ;
TINU, CK .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1994, 38 (11) :2541-2544
[4]   Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic comparison of amphotericin B (AMB) and two lipid-associated AMB preparations, liposomal AMB and AMB lipid complex, in murine candidiasis models [J].
Andes, D ;
Safdar, N ;
Marchillo, K ;
Conklin, R .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2006, 50 (02) :674-684
[5]   Antifungal Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Established and Emerging Indications [J].
Andes, David ;
Pascual, Andres ;
Marchetti, Oscar .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 53 (01) :24-34
[6]   Current and future antifungal therapy: new targets for antifungal agents [J].
Andriole, VT .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 44 (02) :151-162
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2003, AMPH PACK INS
[8]   Pharmacology of systemic antifungal agents [J].
Ashley, Elizabeth S. Dodds ;
Lewis, Russell ;
Lewis, James S. ;
Martin, Craig ;
Andes, David .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 43 :S28-S39
[9]  
*AST PHARM US INC, 2005, MYC PACK INS
[10]   Invasive mold infections in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients [J].
Baddley, JW ;
Stroud, TP ;
Salzman, D ;
Pappas, PG .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 32 (09) :1319-1324