An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis

被引:10
作者
Sivayoham, Narani [1 ]
Hussain, Adil N. [1 ]
Shabbo, Luke [1 ]
Christie, Dylon [1 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Emergency Med, Blackshaw Rd, London SW17 0QT, England
关键词
Clinical prediction rule; emergency department; prognosis; discrimination; sepsis; septic shock; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; FAILURE ASSESSMENT SCORE; GOAL-DIRECTED THERAPY; EARLY WARNING SCORE; SEPTIC SHOCK; ORGAN FAILURE; MORTALITY; CARE; VALIDATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1080/07853890.2021.1992495
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the performance of the Risk-stratification of Emergency Department suspected Sepsis (REDS) score to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores, to risk-stratify Emergency Department (ED) suspected sepsis patients for mortality. Method A retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data. Adult patients admitted from the ED after receiving intravenous antibiotics for suspected sepsis in the year 2020, were studied. Patients with COVID-19 were excluded. The scores stated above were calculated for each patient. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for each score for the primary outcome measure, all-cause in-hospital mortality. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curves and cut-off points were identified by the statistical software. Scores above the cut-off point were deemed high-risk. The test characteristics of the high-risk groups were calculated. Comparisons were based on the AUROC curve and sensitivity for mortality of the high-risk groups. Previously published cut-off points were also studied. Calibration was also studied. Results Of the 2594 patients studied, 332 (12.8%) died. The AUROC curve for the REDS score 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.75) was significantly greater than the AUROC curve for the SIRS criteria 0.51 (95% CI 0.49-0.53), p < .0001 and the NEWS2 score 0.69 (95% CI 0.67-0.70), p = .005, and similar to all other scores studied. Sensitivity for mortality at the respective cut-off points identified (REDS >= 3, NEWS2 >= 8, CURB65 >= 3, SOFA >= 3, MEDS >= 10 and PIRO >= 10) was greatest for the REDS score at 80.1% (95% CI 75.4-84.3) and significantly greater than the other scores. The sensitivity for mortality for an increase of two points from baseline in the SOFA score was 63% (95% CI 57.5-68.2). Conclusions In this single centre study, the REDS score had either a greater AUROC curve or sensitivity for mortality compared to the comparator scores, at the respective cut-off points identified. KEY MESSAGES The REDS score is a simple and objective scoring system to risk-stratify for mortality in emergency department (MED) patients with suspected sepsis. The REDS score is better or equivalent to existing scoring systems in its discrimination for mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:1863 / 1874
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Prognostic Accuracy of SOFA, qSOFA, and SIRS for Mortality Among Emergency Department Patients with Infections
    Bin Abdullah, S. M. Osama
    Sorensen, Rune Husas
    Nielsen, Finn Erland
    [J]. INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2021, 14 : 2763 - 2775
  • [2] AMERICAN-COLLEGE OF CHEST PHYSICIANS SOCIETY OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE CONSENSUS CONFERENCE - DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS
    BONE, RC
    BALK, RA
    CERRA, FB
    DELLINGER, RP
    FEIN, AM
    KNAUS, WA
    SCHEIN, RMH
    SIBBALD, WJ
    ABRAMS, JH
    BERNARD, GR
    BIONDI, JW
    CALVIN, JE
    DEMLING, R
    FAHEY, PJ
    FISHER, CJ
    FRANKLIN, C
    GORELICK, KJ
    KELLEY, MA
    MAKI, DG
    MARSHALL, JC
    MERRILL, WW
    PRIBBLE, JP
    RACKOW, EC
    RODELL, TC
    SHEAGREN, JN
    SILVER, M
    SPRUNG, CL
    STRAUBE, RC
    TOBIN, MJ
    TRENHOLME, GM
    WAGNER, DP
    WEBB, CD
    WHERRY, JC
    WIEDEMANN, HP
    WORTEL, CH
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1992, 20 (06) : 864 - 874
  • [3] Predicting mortality in patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department; A retrospective cohort study comparing qSOFA, SIRS and National Early Warning Score
    Brink, Anniek
    Alsma, Jelmer
    Verdonschot, Rob Johannes Carel Gerardus
    Rood, Pleunie Petronella Marie
    Zietse, Robert
    Lingsma, Hester Floor
    Schuit, Stephanie Catherine Elisabeth
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [4] Utility of a single early warning score in patients with sepsis in the emergency department
    Corfield, Alasdair R.
    Lees, Fiona
    Zealley, Ian
    Houston, Gordon
    Dickie, Sarah
    Ward, Kirsty
    McGuffie, Crawford
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2014, 31 (06) : 482 - 487
  • [5] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [6] qSOFA, SIRS and NEWS for predicting inhospital mortality and ICU admission in emergency admissions treated as sepsis
    Goulden, Robert
    Hoyle, Marie-Claire
    Monis, Jessie
    Railton, Darran
    Riley, Victoria
    Martin, Paul
    Martina, Reynaldo
    Nsutebu, Emmanuel
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2018, 35 (06) : 345 - 349
  • [7] A Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Critical Care Triage
    Grissom, Colin K.
    Brown, Samuel M.
    Kuttler, Kathryn G.
    Boltax, Jonathan P.
    Jones, Jason
    Jephson, Al R.
    Orme, James F., Jr.
    [J]. DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2010, 4 (04) : 277 - 284
  • [8] Predictive accuracy and feasibility of risk stratification scores for 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis in an emergency department
    Hilderink, Michelle J. M.
    Roest, Asselina A.
    Hermans, Maud
    Keulemans, Yolande C.
    Stehouwer, Coen D. A.
    Stassen, Patricia M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (05) : 331 - 337
  • [9] Hosmer DW, 2013, WILEY SER PROBAB ST, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781118548387
  • [10] Proof of principle: The predisposition, infection, response, organ failure sepsis staging system
    Howell, Michael D.
    Talmor, Daniel
    Schuetz, Philipp
    Hunziker, Sabina
    Jones, Alan E.
    Shapiro, Nathan I.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (02) : 322 - 327