Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats

被引:4
作者
Minnig, Adrian [1 ]
Zufferey, Romane [1 ]
Thomann, Beat [2 ]
Zwygart, Sibylle [3 ]
Keil, Nina [3 ]
Schupbach-Regula, Gertraud [2 ]
Miserez, Raymond [4 ]
Stucki, Dimitri [1 ]
Zanolari, Patrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Vetsuisse Fac, Clin Ruminants, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Vetsuisse Fac, Vet Publ Hlth Inst, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Agroscope, Fed Food Safety & Vet Off, Ctr Proper Housing Ruminants & Pigs, CH-8356 Tanikon, Switzerland
[4] Consulting & Hlth Serv Small Ruminants, CH-3362 Niederonz, Switzerland
关键词
goat; small ruminant; animal-based; welfare assessment; welfare indicators; on-farm; QUALITATIVE BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT; DAIRY GOATS; ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL; SMALL RUMINANTS; INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; SCORING SYSTEM; SHEEP; MASTITIS;
D O I
10.3390/ani11113138
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary: Welfare assessments for animals require the use of specific indicators. These indicators should be practical and easy to use in an on-farm environment while correctly reflecting on the animals' welfare. Our aim was to review literature on such indicators for goats, as small ruminants have not received as much attention as other farm animals in the field of welfare assessment. Some indicators such as lameness are already well investigated and suitable for use in goat welfare assessments. Others, for example, lying behaviour, need more research, as the limited amount of knowledge restrains the information on validity or usefulness. As in other animals, the welfare of goats has become an increasingly important issue in public discourse. Our overview on indicators aids in developing tools to measure and improve the welfare of goats.This review describes the current state of knowledge relating to scientific literature on welfare indicators for goats. Our aim was to provide an overview of animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessments. We performed a literature search and extracted 96 relevant articles by title, abstract, and full-text screening. Out of these articles, similar indicators were aggregated to result in a total of 32 welfare indicators, some of which were covered in multiple articles, others in only a single one. We discuss a set of three established assessment protocols containing these indicators, as well as all individual indicators which were covered in more than one article. As single indicators, we identified lameness, body condition score (BCS), qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA), and human-animal relationship (HAR) tests with substantial evidence for sufficient validity to assess welfare in goats. A multitude of indicators (e.g., hair coat condition) was studied less intensively but was successfully used for welfare assessments. For some indicators (e.g., oblivion, lying behaviour), we highlight the need for future research to further validate them or to optimise their use in on-farm welfare assessments. Moreover, further investigations need to include kids, bucks, and meat and fibre goats, as well as extensively kept goats as the literature predominantly focuses on dairy goats in intensive production systems.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Relevance of animal-based indicators for the evaluation of sheep welfare as perceived by different stakeholders [J].
Marcone, Giovanni ;
Carnovale, Francesca ;
Arney, David ;
De Rosa, Giuseppe ;
Napolitano, Fabio .
SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2022, 217
[32]   Indicators to assess goat welfare on-farm in the semiarid region of Brazilian Northeast [J].
Leite, Luana Oliveira ;
Stamm, Fabiana de Orte ;
Maria Garcia, Rita de Cassia .
CIENCIA RURAL, 2017, 47 (09)
[33]   Beef cattle welfare assessment: use of resource and animal-based indicators, blood parameters and hair 20β-dihydrocortisol [J].
Tarantola, Martina ;
Biasato, Ilaria ;
Biasibetti, Elena ;
Biagini, Davide ;
Capra, Pierluigi ;
Guarda, Franco ;
Leporati, Marta ;
Malfatto, Vanda ;
Cavallarin, Laura ;
Miniscalco, Barbara ;
Mioletti, Silvia ;
Vincenti, Marco ;
Gastaldo, Alessandro ;
Capucchio, Maria Teresa .
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 19 (01) :341-350
[34]   An animal-based welfare assessment of group-housed calves on UK dairy farms [J].
Whay, HR ;
Main, DCJ ;
Green, LE ;
Webster, AJF .
ANIMAL WELFARE, 2003, 12 (04) :611-617
[35]   Preliminary assessment of finishing pig welfare using animal-based measurements [J].
Whay, H. R. ;
Leeb, C. ;
Maint, D. C. J. ;
Green, L. E. ;
Webster, A. J. F. .
ANIMAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (02) :209-211
[36]   Evaluation of inter-observer reliability in the case of trichotomous and four-level animal-based welfare indicators with two observers [J].
Torsiello, Benedetta ;
Giammarino, Mauro ;
Quatto, Piero ;
Battini, Monica ;
Mattiello, Silvana ;
Battaglini, Luca ;
Renna, Manuela .
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 23 (01) :938-960
[37]   Development and refinement o f three animal-based broiler chicken welfare indicators [J].
Souza, A. P. O. ;
Soriano, V. S. ;
Schnaider, M. A. ;
Rucinque, D. S. ;
Molento, C. F. M. .
ANIMAL WELFARE, 2018, 27 (03) :263-274
[38]   Assessing the Validity of Animal-Based Indicators of Sheep Health and Welfare: Do Observers Agree? [J].
Phythian, Clare J. ;
Michalopoulou, Eleni ;
Duncan, Jennifer S. .
AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2019, 9 (05)
[39]   The Assessment of Housing Conditions, Management, Animal-Based Welfare, and Its Association with Productive and Reproductive Traits [J].
Tiezzi, Francesco ;
Tomassone, Laura ;
Mancin, Gilberto ;
Cornale, Paolo ;
Tarantola, Martina .
ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (11)
[40]   ANIMAL WELL-BEING AND BEHAVIOR On-farm welfare assessment of commercial Pekin ducks: a comparison of methods [J].
Abdelfattah, Essam ;
Vezzoli, Giuseppe ;
Makagon, Maja M. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2020, 99 (02) :689-697