Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats

被引:4
作者
Minnig, Adrian [1 ]
Zufferey, Romane [1 ]
Thomann, Beat [2 ]
Zwygart, Sibylle [3 ]
Keil, Nina [3 ]
Schupbach-Regula, Gertraud [2 ]
Miserez, Raymond [4 ]
Stucki, Dimitri [1 ]
Zanolari, Patrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Vetsuisse Fac, Clin Ruminants, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Vetsuisse Fac, Vet Publ Hlth Inst, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Agroscope, Fed Food Safety & Vet Off, Ctr Proper Housing Ruminants & Pigs, CH-8356 Tanikon, Switzerland
[4] Consulting & Hlth Serv Small Ruminants, CH-3362 Niederonz, Switzerland
来源
ANIMALS | 2021年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
goat; small ruminant; animal-based; welfare assessment; welfare indicators; on-farm; QUALITATIVE BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT; DAIRY GOATS; ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL; SMALL RUMINANTS; INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; SCORING SYSTEM; SHEEP; MASTITIS;
D O I
10.3390/ani11113138
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary: Welfare assessments for animals require the use of specific indicators. These indicators should be practical and easy to use in an on-farm environment while correctly reflecting on the animals' welfare. Our aim was to review literature on such indicators for goats, as small ruminants have not received as much attention as other farm animals in the field of welfare assessment. Some indicators such as lameness are already well investigated and suitable for use in goat welfare assessments. Others, for example, lying behaviour, need more research, as the limited amount of knowledge restrains the information on validity or usefulness. As in other animals, the welfare of goats has become an increasingly important issue in public discourse. Our overview on indicators aids in developing tools to measure and improve the welfare of goats.<br>This review describes the current state of knowledge relating to scientific literature on welfare indicators for goats. Our aim was to provide an overview of animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessments. We performed a literature search and extracted 96 relevant articles by title, abstract, and full-text screening. Out of these articles, similar indicators were aggregated to result in a total of 32 welfare indicators, some of which were covered in multiple articles, others in only a single one. We discuss a set of three established assessment protocols containing these indicators, as well as all individual indicators which were covered in more than one article. As single indicators, we identified lameness, body condition score (BCS), qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA), and human-animal relationship (HAR) tests with substantial evidence for sufficient validity to assess welfare in goats. A multitude of indicators (e.g., hair coat condition) was studied less intensively but was successfully used for welfare assessments. For some indicators (e.g., oblivion, lying behaviour), we highlight the need for future research to further validate them or to optimise their use in on-farm welfare assessments. Moreover, further investigations need to include kids, bucks, and meat and fibre goats, as well as extensively kept goats as the literature predominantly focuses on dairy goats in intensive production systems.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hair coat condition: A valid and reliable indicator for on-farm welfare assessment in adult dairy goats
    Battini, Monica
    Peric, Tanja
    Ajuda, Ines
    Vieira, Ana
    Grosso, Lilia
    Barbieri, Sara
    Stilwell, George
    Prandi, Alberto
    Comin, Antonella
    Tubaro, Franco
    Mattiello, Silvana
    SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2015, 123 (2-3) : 197 - 203
  • [22] On-farm Qualitative Behaviour Assessment of dairy goats in different housing conditions
    Grosso, Lilia
    Battini, Monica
    Wemelsfelder, Francoise
    Barbieri, Sara
    Minero, Michela
    Costa, Emanuela Dalla
    Mattiello, Silvana
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2016, 180 : 51 - 57
  • [23] On-farm welfare monitoring system for goats based on Internet of Things and machine learning
    Rao, Yuan
    Jiang, Min
    Wang, Wen
    Zhang, Wu
    Wang, Ruchuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORKS, 2020, 16 (07)
  • [24] Applications for methods of on-farm welfare assessment
    Main, DCJ
    Kent, JP
    Wemelsfelder, F
    Ofner, E
    Tuyttens, FAM
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2003, 12 (04) : 523 - 528
  • [25] Experimental welfare assessment and on-farm application
    Edwards, S. A.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (02) : 111 - 115
  • [26] The Use of the General Animal-Based Measures Codified Terms in the Scientific Literature on Farm Animal Welfare
    Brscic, Marta
    Contiero, Barbara
    Magrin, Luisa
    Riuzzi, Giorgia
    Gottardo, Flaviana
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [27] A comparison of online and live training of livestock farmers for an on-farm self-assessment of animal welfare
    Michaelis, Sarina
    Schubbert, Antje
    Gieseke, Daniel
    Cimer, Kornel
    Zapf, Rita
    Luehken, Sally
    March, Solveig
    Brinkmann, Jan
    Schultheiss, Ute
    Knierim, Ute
    FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 3
  • [28] On-farm welfare monitoring of small ruminants
    Caroprese, M.
    Napolitano, F.
    Mattiello, S.
    Fthenakis, G. C.
    Ribo, O.
    Sevi, A.
    SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2016, 135 : 20 - 25
  • [29] Relevance of animal-based indicators for the evaluation of sheep welfare as perceived by different stakeholders
    Marcone, Giovanni
    Carnovale, Francesca
    Arney, David
    De Rosa, Giuseppe
    Napolitano, Fabio
    SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2022, 217
  • [30] Indicators to assess goat welfare on-farm in the semiarid region of Brazilian Northeast
    Leite, Luana Oliveira
    Stamm, Fabiana de Orte
    Maria Garcia, Rita de Cassia
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2017, 47 (09):