Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Obese (Body Mass Index ≥ 30 Kg/M2) Patients

The comparative outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in obese (body mass index >= 30 kg/m(2)) patients are underexplored. Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried from 2011 to 2014, and those who underwent TAVI or SAVR with obesity were identified. A complete case analysis with multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for the difference in underlying co-morbidities. We identified a total of 12,525 patients (989 TAVI and 11,536 SAVR). TAVI patients were elderly, more women, and had higher co-morbidity burden represented by a higher Deyo's modification of Charlson's score. Inpatient mortality was similar between the 2 groups (2.6% vs 3.2%, p = 0.21). TAVI patients had less hemorrhage requiring transfusion (8.5% vs 18%, p < 0.01), cardiac complication (7.3% vs 14%, p < 0.01), respiratory complication (1.3% vs 3.9%, p < 0.01), postop sepsis (1.0% vs 3.2%, p < 0.01), acute myocardial infarction (2.5% vs 5.5%, p < 0.01), acute kidney injury (18% vs 22%, p < 0.001), and nonroutine discharge (62% vs 67%, p < 0.001). Conversely, vascular complication (5.6% vs 4.5%, p = 0.04), new pacemaker (13% vs 5.4%, p < 0.001), and use of extracorporeal oxygen membrane (1.1% vs 0.3%, p = 0.002) were observed more frequently in TAVI patients. The median hospital cost was higher in TAVI ($50,957 vs $44,977, p = 0.004), whereas TAVI patients had a significantly shorter hospital stay (median 7.4 vs 10 days, p < 0.001). TAVI portended similar in-hospital mortality and less certain perioperative complications. In TAVI, the medical cost was higher, but the length of stay was shorter and nonroutine discharge was less frequent. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.