Profiling Victims of Investment Fraud: Mindsets and Risky Behaviors

被引:50
作者
Deliema, Marguerite [1 ]
Shadel, Doug [2 ]
Pak, Karla [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Social Work, Res, Peters Hall 1404 Gortner Ave, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] AARP, 18000 Int Blvd, Seatac, WA 98188 USA
[3] AARP Washington, 18000 Int Blvd, Seatac, WA 98188 USA
关键词
opportunity model of predatory victimization; materialism; investment scam; remote investing; ROUTINE ACTIVITY THEORY; SELF-CONTROL; VICTIMIZATION; SCALE; SCAMS;
D O I
10.1093/jcr/ucz020
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Millions of Americans are targeted by investment scams, resulting in billions of dollars lost each year. Previous research indicates that investment fraud victims are more likely to be male, white, and married, and to have higher socioeconomic status compared to the general US population, but little research examines what behaviors and mindsets differentiate them from other investors. A telephone survey was administered to 214 investment fraud victims and 813 general investors recruited using random digit dialing. Based on the opportunity model of predatory victimization, the aim was to identify differences in investment behaviors and psychological mindsets that may affect exposure to investment scams and make individuals more attractive and susceptible targets. In addition to being older and male, victims were more materialistic than general investors and were more frequent stock traders, and purchased more investments sold through unsolicited calls, emails, television advertisements, or "free lunch" seminars, but were less likely to invest based on a social network member's recommendation. As more retirees begin to take on managing their retirement assets, many may be tempted by unreasonable investment returns promised by unscrupulous brokers. Findings point to specific areas where investor education is needed to counteract poor investment decision-making and risky mindsets.
引用
收藏
页码:904 / 914
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Anderson K.B., 2013, Consumer fraud in the United States, 2011: The third FTC survey
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Research Report from a 2012 National Survey
[3]   Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment [J].
Barber, BM ;
Odean, T .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (01) :261-292
[4]   Stock market scams, shell companies, penny shares, boiler rooms and cold calling: The UK experience [J].
Barnes, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW CRIME AND JUSTICE, 2017, 48 :50-64
[5]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[6]   How Does Survey Context Impact Self-reported Fraud Victimization? [J].
Beals, Michaela E. ;
Carr, Dawn C. ;
Mottola, Gary R. ;
Deevy, Martha J. ;
Carstensen, Laura L. .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2017, 57 (02) :329-340
[7]   DENYING THE GUILTY MIND: ACCOUNTING FOR INVOLVEMENT IN A WHITE-COLLAR CRIME [J].
Benson, Michael L. .
CRIMINOLOGY, 1985, 23 (04) :583-607
[8]  
Bhandari Gokul., 2006, Journal of Behavioral Finance, V7, P5, DOI [10.1207/s15427579jpfm01_2, DOI 10.1207/S15427579JPFM0701_2]
[9]  
Blum R.H., 1972, Deceivers and deceived
[10]  
observations on confidence men and