Suppliers versus Lead Users: Examining Their Relative Impact on Product Variety

被引:38
作者
Al-Zu'bi, Zu'bi M. F. [1 ]
Tsinopoulos, Christos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Durham Business Sch, Durham DH7 7TQ, England
关键词
US BICYCLE INDUSTRY; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; INNOVATION; DESIGN; DETERMINANTS; TECHNOLOGY; MARKET; LINE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00932.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Collaboration with parties external to the new product development (NPD) process is seen as a means to reduce costs and improve the product offering to customers. On the suppliers' side, collaboration during the NPD process may lead to a faster and more efficient process. On the users' or customers' side, collaboration may provide ideas for entirely new products and/or modifications to existing ones. This paper examines how collaboration with suppliers and a group of users that experience needs unknown to the public, the so-called lead users, affects the resulting variety of the products offered. The paper focuses on product variety because of its increasing perceived importance in the satisfaction of changing customer needs. Hierarchical regression analysis of survey data collected from 313 U.K. manufacturers revealed a significant positive relationship between collaboration and product variety. The key findings are that increasing the extent of collaboration with lead users and with suppliers during the NPD process will increase the variety of products offered to customers, and that lead users have a higher impact on product variety to suppliers. Previous studies have found that collaboration increases NPD performance, but to the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first to explicitly explore the link with product variety. The paper concludes by discussing the findings' practical implications, limitations, and recommendations for future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 680
页数:14
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Mass customisation - an automotive perspective [J].
Alford, D ;
Sackett, P ;
Nelder, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2000, 65 (01) :99-110
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Marketing Management
[4]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[5]   How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study [J].
Baldwin, Carliss ;
Hienerth, Christoph ;
von Hippel, Eric .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (09) :1291-1313
[6]   Product proliferation: An empirical analysis of product line determinants and market outcomes [J].
Bayus, BL ;
Putsis, WP .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 18 (02) :137-153
[7]  
Bonner JM, 2002, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V19, P233, DOI 10.1016/S0737-6782(02)00139-X
[8]   Exploring the Relationships Between Product Development and Environmental Turbulence: The Case of Mobile TLC Services [J].
Buganza, Tommaso ;
Dell'Era, Claudio ;
Verganti, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2009, 26 (03) :308-321
[9]   The importance of customer input in the development of very new products [J].
Callahan, J ;
Lasry, E .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2004, 34 (02) :107-120
[10]  
Christopher M., 2000, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, V5, P206, DOI [DOI 10.1108/13598540010347334, 10.1108/13598540010347334]