Government auditing and environmental governance: Evidence from China's auditing system reform

被引:58
作者
Cao, Hongjie [1 ]
Zhang, Li [2 ]
Qi, Yu [3 ]
Yang, Zhiming [4 ]
Li, Xiangyun [3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Sch Econ, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Sch Econ, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Dongling Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Government auditing; Centralized reform; Environmental governance; Output performance; China; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106705
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Government auditing is an important mechanism for supervising the use of fiscal funds, preventing official corruption, and improving governance performance. The performance of government auditing is affected by its independence. Taking vertical management reform of government auditing institutions-an initiative China began to pilot in 2015-as the exogenous shock to government auditing and its incentive structure, this paper used the differences-in-differences method (DID) to evaluate the impact of government auditing on the performance of environmental governance. The reform was found to have significantly reduced the intensity of pollutant emissions and a series of robustness tests confirm the validity of this conclusion. The environmental effect of government auditing reform was mainly achieved by improving environmental performance, not by increasing environmental investment. Specifically, the reform had no direct impact on environmental fiscal expenditure; Rather, it improved environmental input-output performance and environmental governance capabilities. The research presented in this paper not only enriches the study of the relationship between (de) centralization and local environmental governance but also provides new evidence of and policy insights into the impact of government auditing on environmental governance.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Polluting thy neighbor: Unintended consequences of China's pollution reduction mandates [J].
Cai, Hongbin ;
Chen, Yuyu ;
Gong, Qing .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 76 :86-104
[2]   Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China [J].
Cai, Xiqian ;
Lu, Yi ;
Wu, Mingqin ;
Yu, Linhui .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 123 :73-85
[3]   Incentive and coordination: Ecological fiscal transfers' effects on eco-environmental quality [J].
Cao, Hongjie ;
Qi, Yu ;
Chen, Jianwei ;
Shao, Shuai ;
Lin, Shixian .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 87
[4]   Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence [J].
Chetty, Raj ;
Looney, Adam ;
Kroft, Kory .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (04) :1145-1177
[5]   Environmental auditing and the role of the accountancy profession: A literature review [J].
De Moor, P ;
De Beelde, I .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 36 (02) :205-219
[6]   Truth-telling by Third-party Auditors and the Response of Polluting Firms: Experimental Evidence from India [J].
Duflo, Esther ;
Greenstone, Michael ;
Pande, Rohini ;
Ryan, Nicholas .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2013, 128 (04) :1499-1545
[7]   Fiscal Policy Dilemma in Resolving Agricultural Risks: Evidence from China's Agricultural Insurance Subsidy Pilot [J].
Gao, Yuqiang ;
Shu, Yongkang ;
Cao, Hongjie ;
Zhou, Shuting ;
Shi, Shaobin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (14)
[8]   ECONOMIC-GROWTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
GROSSMAN, GM ;
KRUEGER, AB .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (02) :353-377
[9]  
Guo L, 2020, FINAN SUPERV, V12, P67
[10]   The effect of government expenditure on the environment: An empirical investigation [J].
Halkos, George E. ;
Paizanos, Epameinondas A. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 91 :48-56