More than just fear: Development and psychometric evaluation of the Spider Distress Scale to assess spider fear and spider-related disgust

被引:0
作者
Peters, Jacqueline [1 ,2 ]
Visser, Renee M. [1 ]
Kindt, Merel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129 B,REC G,Room 1-23, NL-1018 WS Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Spider fear; Disgust; Specific phobias; Psychometrics; Factor analysis; CONTAMINATION-BASED OCD; COGNITIVE REAPPRAISAL; ANXIETY; PHOBIA; AVOIDANCE; SENSITIVITY; EXTINCTION; EXPOSURE; PREVALENCE; CONSTRUCTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102602
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Spider fear is an excellent model to experimentally study processes in the maintenance and treatment of long-lasting fears. A valid, reliable, and practical tool to assess spider-related distress dimensionally, and to differ-entiate between spider-related fear and disgust in a time-sensitive manner, may help to better understand in-dividual differences in these two emotions and to tailor treatments accordingly. We developed a concise self-report questionnaire, the Spider Distress Scale (SDS), that combines the strengths of established spider fear questionnaires and addresses their shortcomings. We explored (study 1 and 2) and confirmed (study 3) a two-factor structure of the SDS in samples from the general population (n = 370; n = 360; n = 423), recruited online via Prolific Academic from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and the United States. The fear and disgust factors of the SDS are highly internally consistent and the SDS has excellent test-retest reliability. We found good convergent and discriminant validity, based on self-report measures and spider behavioural approach tasks, and the SDS successfully differentiated between individuals with and without spider fear (study 4, n = 75). Our series of studies suggests that fear and disgust are functionally related, but that disgust towards spiders can be differentially assessed when focussing on unique elements of disgust-related information.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Adams T. L., 2020, AIS Transactions on Replication Research, V6, DOI DOI 10.17705/1ATRR.00058
  • [2] American Psychiatric Association, 2022, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, V5th ed., text rev., DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
  • [3] First-line Treatment: A Critical Appraisal of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Developments and Alternatives
    Arch, Joanna J.
    Craske, Michelle G.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 32 (03) : 525 - +
  • [4] BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  • [5] Factors influencing the success of exposure therapy for specific phobia: A systematic review
    Boehnlein, Joscha
    Altegoer, Luisa
    Muck, Nina Kristin
    Roesmann, Kati
    Redlich, Ronny
    Dannlowski, Udo
    Leehr, Elisabeth J.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2020, 108 : 796 - 820
  • [6] Is disgust sensitive to classical conditioning as indexed by facial electromyography and behavioural responses?
    Borg, Charmaine
    Bosman, Renske C.
    Engelhard, Iris
    Olatunji, Bunmi O.
    de Jong, Peter J.
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2016, 30 (04) : 669 - 686
  • [7] Browne M.W., 1993, SOCIOL METHOD RES, P445
  • [8] Buchanan E. M., 2014, SAGE RES METHODS CAS, DOI [10.4135/978144627305013517794, DOI 10.4135/978144627305013517794]
  • [9] Cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials
    Carpenter, Joseph K.
    Andrews, Leigh A.
    Witcraft, Sara M.
    Powers, Mark B.
    Smits, Jasper A. J.
    Hofmann, Stefan G.
    [J]. DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2018, 35 (06) : 502 - 514
  • [10] SCREE TEST FOR NUMBER OF FACTORS
    CATTELL, RB
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1966, 1 (02) : 245 - 276