From conception to performance: How undergraduate students conceptualise and construct essays

被引:38
作者
Campbell, J [1 ]
Smith, D [1 ]
Brooker, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Learning & Dev, Ctr Cognit Proc Learning, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1023/A:1003451627898
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Interviews with forty six undergraduate students enrolled in either first or third year of a Bachelor of Education explored how they conceptualised and undertook an essay writing task. The conceptual structure of their essays was analysed using the SOLO Taxonomy. Comparisons between students who wrote essays of differing levels of complexity revealed that there were major differences between students at every stage of the essay writing process. Compared to students writing essays with simple conceptual structures, students writing more complex essays engaged in processes of reconstruction rather than "knowledge telling", put more effort into finding references, used organisational systems for integrating their notes according to topics or themes, built "arguments" rather than presented "information" when structuring and drafting their essays, were concerned with improving ideas and arguments as well as mechanics when revising their essays, had a more sophisticated understanding of the concepts underlying the assessment criteria, and expected and received higher grades. The results suggest a developmental process in underlying conceptualisations of both the body of knowledge forming the content of the essay, and the essay writing processes themselves. As such, attempts to improve students' essay writing skills need to shift from a focus on discrete skills to an emphasis on the relationship between students' understanding of the content and their ability to write about it. As part of the writing process, students need help building understandings representing the body of knowledge they are writing about, and this help needs to be geared to their current level of operation.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 469
页数:21
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]   FRAMEWORKS FOR UNDERSTANDING AS EXPERIENCED IN ESSAY WRITING AND IN PREPARING FOR EXAMINATIONS [J].
ENTWISTLE, N .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1995, 30 (01) :47-54
[12]   KNOWLEDGE OBJECTS - UNDERSTANDINGS CONSTITUTED THROUGH INTENSIVE ACADEMIC STUDY [J].
ENTWISTLE, N ;
MARTON, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 64 :161-178
[13]  
Entwistle N., 1991, Designing environments for constructive learning
[14]  
Hayes J.R., 1987, ADV APPL PSYCHOLINGU, V2, P176, DOI DOI 10.1017/CB09780511571374
[15]  
HAYES JR, 1997, SCI WRITING THEORIES, P1
[16]  
Hounsell D., 1987, Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology, V10, P109
[17]  
Hounsell D., 1984, Higher Education Research and Development, V3, P13, DOI 10.1080/0729436840030102
[18]   ESSAY-WRITING - DO STUDY MANUALS GIVE RELEVANT ADVICE [J].
MAHALSKI, PA .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1992, 24 (01) :113-132
[19]   QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING .1. OUTCOME AND PROCESS [J].
MARTON, F ;
SALJO, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 46 (FEB) :4-11
[20]   NON-VERBATIM LEARNING .1. LEVEL OF PROCESSING AND LEVEL OF OUTCOME [J].
MARTON, F .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 16 (04) :273-279