Safety of cell salvage in tumor surgery Systematic review with meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Frietsch, T. [1 ,6 ]
Steinbicker, A. U. [2 ]
Hackbusch, M. [3 ]
Nguyen, X. D. [4 ]
Dietrich, G. [5 ]
机构
[1] IAKH, Marburg, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Munster, Klin Anasthesiol Operat Intens Med & Schmerzthera, Munster, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometrie & Informat, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Amita Lab Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
[5] Rottal Inn Kliniken, Abt Anasthesie Intens Med Schmerztherapie & Trans, Eggenfelden, Germany
[6] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fak Mannheim, Anasthesiol & Intens Med, Theodor Kutzer Ufer 1-3, D-68165 Mannheim, Germany
来源
ANAESTHESIST | 2020年 / 69卷 / 05期
关键词
Blood transfusion; autologous; Leucocyte depletion; Cell salvage; Metastasis; Outcome; INTRAOPERATIVE BLOOD SALVAGE; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; LEUKOCYTE DEPLETION FILTER; AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; CANCER-SURGERY; AUTOTRANSFUSION SYSTEM; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; ALLOGENEIC TRANSFUSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00101-020-00751-4
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Allogeneic blood transfusion is avoidable in many oncological interventions by the use of cell salvage or mechanical autotransfusion (MAT). As irradiation is elaborate and expensive, the safety of leucocyte depletion filters (LDF) for autologous blood from the surgical field might be a more acceptable alternative for the prevention of cancer recurrences. A previous meta-analysis could not identify an increased risk of cancer recurrence. The aim of this review article is to provide an update of a previous meta-analysis from 2012 as well as a safety analysis of cell salvage with LDF due to the improved data situation. Material and methods This systematic review included all studies in PubMed, Cochrane, Cochrane Reviews and Web of Science on cell salvage or autotransfusion combined with outcomes, e.g. cancer recurrence, mortality, survival, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay (LOS) after the use of MAT without irradiation and with or without LDF. The grades of recommendations (GRADE) assessment of underlying evidence was applied. Results A total of seven new observational studies and seven meta-analyses were found that compared unfiltered or filtered cell salvage with autologous predeposition, allogeneic transfusion or without any transfusion. No randomized controlled trials have been completed. A total of 27 observational and cohort studies were included in a meta-analysis. The evidence level was low. The risk of cancer recurrence in recipients of autologous salvaged blood with or without LDF was reduced (odds ratio, OR 0.71, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.58-0.86) as compared to non-transfused subjects, allogeneic or predeposited autologous transfusion. The transfusion rate could not be assessed due to the substantial selection bias and large heterogeneity. Cell salvage does not change mortality and LOS. Leucocyte depletion studies reported a removal rate of cancer cells in the range of 99.6-99.9%. Conclusion Randomized controlled trials on a comparison of MAT and allogeneic blood transfusion as well as LDF and irradiation would be desirable but are not available. From observational trials and more than 6300 subjects and various tumors, cell salvage in cancer surgery with or without LDF appears to be sufficiently safe. The efficacy of leucocyte depletion of autologous salvaged blood is equivalent to irradiation. Unavailability of radiation is not a contraindication for cell salvage use in cancer surgery. By usage of leucocyte depleted salvaged autologous blood, the risks of allogeneic transfusion can be avoided.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 351
页数:21
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Effect of autotransfusion system on tumor recurrence and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients [J].
Akbulut, Sami ;
Kayaalp, Cuneyt ;
Yilmaz, Mehmet ;
Ince, Volkan ;
Ozgor, Dincer ;
Karabulut, Koray ;
Eris, Cengiz ;
Toprak, Huseyin Ilksen ;
Aydin, Cemalettin ;
Yilmaz, Sezai .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (10) :1625-1631
[2]   Cardiopulmonary bypass and cell-saver technique in combined oncologic and cardiovascular surgery [J].
Akchurin, RS ;
Davidov, MI ;
Partigulov, SA ;
Brand, JB ;
Shiriaev, AA ;
Lepilin, MG ;
Dolgov, IM .
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 1997, 21 (07) :763-765
[3]  
Allain Jean-Pierre, 1999, British Journal of Anaesthesia, V82, P783
[4]  
AMATO A, 2006, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V1, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD005033.PUB2
[5]   Towards bloodless cystectomy: a 10-year experience of intra-operative cell salvage during radical cystectomy [J].
Aning, Jonathan ;
Dunn, Jamie ;
Daugherty, Mark ;
Mason, Robert ;
Pocock, Richard ;
Ridler, Biddy ;
Thompson, John ;
McGrath, John S. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11B) :E608-E613
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, QUERSCHNITTS LEITLIN
[7]   Does autologous blood transfusion during liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma increase risk of recurrence? [J].
Araujo, Raphael L. C. ;
Pantanali, Carlos Andres ;
Haddad, Luciana ;
Rocha Filho, Joel Avancini ;
Carneiro D'Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto ;
Andraus, Wellington .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 8 (02) :161-168
[8]   Amendment to the transfusion act: Easing of legal provisions on salvaged blood preparations [J].
Auer, F .
ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2004, 39 (11) :685-686
[9]   Phase II Comparison Study of Intraoperative Autotransfusion for Major Oncologic Procedures [J].
Bower, Matthew R. ;
Ellis, Susan F. ;
Scoggins, Charles R. ;
McMasters, Kelly M. ;
Martin, Robert C. G. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (01) :166-173
[10]  
*BUND, 2017, DTSCH ARZTEBL, V114, P31