Risk factors for excess all-cause mortality during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in England: A retrospective cohort study of primary care data

被引:17
作者
Carey, Iain M. [1 ]
Cook, Derek G. [1 ]
Harris, Tess [1 ]
DeWilde, Stephen [1 ]
Chaudhry, Umar A. R. [1 ]
Strachan, David P. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ London, Populat Hlth Res Inst, London, England
关键词
OBSERVATIONAL COHORT; UK; INFECTION; DEATH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0260381
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background The COVID-19 pandemic's first wave in England during spring 2020 resulted in an approximate 50% increase in all-cause mortality. Previously, risk factors such as age and ethnicity, were identified by studying COVID-related deaths only, but these were under-recorded during this period. Objective To use a large electronic primary care database to estimate the impact of risk factors (RFs) on excess mortality in England during the first wave, compared with the impact on total mortality during 2015-19. Methods Medical history, ethnicity, area-based deprivation and vital status data were extracted for an average of 4.8 million patients aged 30-104 years, for each year between 18-March and 19-May over a 6-year period (2015-2020). We used Poisson regression to model total mortality adjusting for age and sex, with interactions between each RF and period (pandemic vs. 2015-19). Total mortality during the pandemic was partitioned into "usual" and "excess" components, assuming 2015-19 rates represented "usual" mortality. The association of each RF with the 2020 "excess" component was derived as the excess mortality ratio (EMR), and compared with the usual mortality ratio (UMR). Results RFs where excess mortality was greatest and notably higher than usual were age >80, non-white ethnicity (e.g., black vs. white EMR = 2.50, 95%CI 1.97-3.18; compared to UMR = 0.92, 95%CI 0.85-1.00), BMI>40, dementia, learning disability, severe mental illness, place of residence (London, care-home, most deprived). By contrast, EMRs were comparable to UMRs for sex. Although some co-morbidities such as cancer produced EMRs significantly below their UMRs, the EMRs were still >1. In contrast current smoking has an EMR below 1 (EMR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.65-0.98) compared to its UMR = 1.64. Conclusions Studying risk factors for excess mortality during the pandemic highlighted differences from studying cause-specific mortality. Our approach illustrates a novel methodology for evaluating a pandemic's impact by individual risk factor without requiring cause-specific mortality data.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Aldridge Robert W, 2020, Wellcome Open Res, V5, P88, DOI 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15922.1
[2]   What is happening to non-covid deaths? [J].
Appleby, John .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 369
[3]   Associations of type 1 and type 2 diabetes with COVID-19-related mortality in England: a whole-population study [J].
Barron, Emma ;
Bakhai, Chirag ;
Kar, Partha ;
Weaver, Andy ;
Bradley, Dominique ;
Ismail, Hassan ;
Knighton, Peter ;
Holman, Naomi ;
Khunti, Kamlesh ;
Sattar, Naveed ;
Wareham, Nicholas J. ;
Young, Bob ;
Valabhji, Jonathan .
LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 8 (10) :813-822
[4]   Factors associated with deaths due to COVID-19 versus other causes: population-based cohort analysis of UK primary care data and linked national death registrations within the OpenSAFELY platform [J].
Bhaskaran, Krishnan ;
Bacon, Sebastian ;
Evans, Stephen J. W. ;
Bates, Chris J. ;
Rentsch, Christopher T. ;
MacKenna, Brian ;
Tomlinson, Laurie ;
Walker, Alex J. ;
Schultze, Anna ;
Morton, Caroline E. ;
Grint, Daniel ;
Mehrkar, Amir ;
Eggo, Rosalind M. ;
Inglesby, Peter ;
Douglas, Ian J. ;
McDonald, Helen, I ;
Cockburn, Jonathan ;
Williamson, Elizabeth J. ;
Evans, David ;
Curtis, Helen J. ;
Hulme, William J. ;
Parry, John ;
Hester, Frank ;
Harper, Sam ;
Spiegelhalter, David ;
Smeeth, Liam ;
Goldacre, Ben .
LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE, 2021, 6
[5]   Risk of adverse outcomes in patients with underlying respiratory conditions admitted to hospital with COVID-19 a national, multicentre prospective cohort study using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK [J].
Bloom, Chloe, I ;
Drake, Thomas M. ;
Docherty, Annemarie B. ;
Lipworth, Brian J. ;
Johnston, Sebastian L. ;
Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S. ;
Carson, Gail ;
Dunning, Jake ;
Harrison, Ewen M. ;
Baillie, J. Kenneth ;
Semple, Malcolm G. ;
Cullinan, Paul ;
Openshaw, Peter J. M. .
LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (07) :699-711
[6]   Cancer guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Burki, Talha Khan .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2020, 21 (05) :629-630
[7]   A new simple primary care morbidity score predicted mortality and better explains between practice variations than the Charlson index [J].
Carey, Iain M. ;
Shah, Sunil M. ;
Harris, Tess ;
DeWilde, Stephen ;
Cook, Derek G. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (04) :436-444
[8]   Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care-recorded mental illness and self-harm episodes in the UK: a population-based cohort study [J].
Carr, Matthew J. ;
Steeg, Sarah ;
Webb, Roger T. ;
Kapur, Nav ;
Chew-Graham, Carolyn A. ;
Abel, Kathryn M. ;
Hope, Holly ;
Pierce, Matthias ;
Ashcroft, Darren M. .
LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 6 (02) :e124-e135
[9]   Prevalence of COVID-19-related risk factors and risk of severe influenza outcomes in cancer survivors: A matched cohort study using linked English electronic health records data [J].
Carreira, Helena ;
Strongman, Helen ;
Peppa, Maria ;
McDonald, Helen, I ;
dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel ;
Stanway, Susannah ;
Smeeth, Liam ;
Bhaskaran, Krishnan .
ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2020, 29-30
[10]   THE READ CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION [J].
CHISHOLM, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 300 (6732) :1092-1092