Comparative Cost Analysis of Housing and Case Management Program for Chronically Ill Homeless Adults Compared to Usual Care

被引:99
作者
Basu, Anirban [1 ,2 ]
Kee, Romina [3 ]
Buchanan, David [4 ]
Sadowski, Laura S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] John H Stroger Jr Hosp Cook Cty, Dept Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Homeless; housing and case management; chronic illnesses; randomized; costs; HEALTH-CARE; EMERGENCY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01350.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To assess the costs of a housing and case management program in a novel sample-homeless adults with chronic medical illnesses. Data Source. The study used data from multiple sources: (1) electronic medical records for hospital, emergency room, and ambulatory medical and mental health visits; (2) institutional and regional databases for days in respite centers, jails, or prisons; and (3) interviews for days in nursing homes, shelters, substance abuse treatment centers, and case manager visits. Total costs were estimated using unit costs for each service. Study Design. Randomized controlled trial of 407 homeless adults with chronic medical illnesses enrolled at two hospitals in Chicago, Illinois, and followed for 18 months. Principal Findings. Compared to usual care, the intervention group generated an average annual cost savings of (-)$6,307 per person (95 percent CI: -16,616, 4,002; p = .23). Subgroup analyses of chronically homeless and those with HIV showed higher per person, annual cost savings of (-)$9,809 and (-)$6,622, respectively. Results were robust to sensitivity analysis using unit costs. Conclusion. The findings of this comprehensive, comparative cost analyses demonstrated an important average annual savings, though in this underpowered study these savings did not achieve statistical significance.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 543
页数:21
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, PREMATURE MORTALITY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780195108248.001.0001
[3]  
[Anonymous], BAIL BURDEN KEEPS US
[4]  
[Anonymous], ACTG QOL 601 602 QOL
[5]  
Culhane D. P., 2002, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V13, P1
[6]  
Donavan S., 2009, PREPARED REMARKS SEC
[7]  
Fleischman S., 1992, DELIVERING HLTH CARE
[8]   Self-reported comorbidities, perceived needs, and sources for usual care for older and younger homeless adults [J].
Garibaldi, B ;
Conde-Martel, A ;
O'Toole, TP .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (08) :726-730
[9]  
Gilmer TP, 2009, PSYCHIAT SERV, V60, P445, DOI 10.1176/appi.ps.60.4.445
[10]   Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score [J].
Hirano, K ;
Imbens, GW ;
Ridder, G .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (04) :1161-1189