Why The Toxic Substances Control Act Needs An Overhaul, And How To Strengthen Oversight Of Chemicals In The Interim

被引:35
作者
Vogel, Sarah A. [1 ]
Roberts, Jody A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johnson Family Fdn, New York, NY USA
[2] Chem Heritage Fdn, Ctr Contemporary Hist & Policy, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0211
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Toxic Substances Control Act gives the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to regulate industrial chemicals not covered by other statutes. Today there are more than 83,000 such chemicals. However, the law is widely perceived as weak and outdated, and various stakeholders have called for its reform, citing the EPA's inability to regulate the use of asbestos, among other substances. We analyze the flaws in the act and suggest ways in which the EPA might better position itself to manage chemical risks and protect the public's health. In addition to the new tools and technologies it is adopting, the agency needs new allies-both inside and outside the government-in its efforts to identify and control hazardous chemicals.
引用
收藏
页码:898 / 905
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Ackerman F., 2008, Poisoned for Pennies: The Economics of Toxics and Precaution
[2]  
Aidala Jr JV, 2010, PRACTICAL ADVICE TSC
[3]  
American Chemistry Council, 10 PRINC MOD TSCA
[4]  
Andrews Richard., 1999, MANAGING ENV MANAGIN
[5]  
[Anonymous], REACH REG EV AUTH RE
[6]  
Applegate JS, 2008, TEX LAW REV, V86, P1365
[7]   Ushering in the new toxicology: Toxicogenomics and the public interest [J].
Balbus, JM .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 113 (07) :818-822
[8]  
Belliveau Mike, 2010, HLTH STATES PROTECTI
[9]  
Denison R. A., 2009, Environmental Law Reporter, V39, P10020
[10]   Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement [J].
Diamanti-Kandarakis, Evanthia ;
Bourguignon, Jean-Pierre ;
Giudice, Linda C. ;
Hauser, Russ ;
Prins, Gail S. ;
Soto, Ana M. ;
Zoeller, R. Thomas ;
Gore, Andrea C. .
ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 2009, 30 (04) :293-342