Inter- and intra-reader reproducibility of shear wave elastography measurements for musculoskeletal soft tissue masses

被引:5
作者
Nicholls, Jonathan [1 ]
Alfuraih, Abdulrahman M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hensor, Elizabeth M. A. [2 ,3 ]
Robinson, Philip [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Teaching Hosp Trust, Chapel Allerton Hosp, Musculoskeletal Ctr, Xray Dept, Chapeltown Rd, Leeds LS7 4SA, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, NIHR Leeds Biomed Res Ctr, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hosp, Leeds Inst Rheumat & Musculoskeletal Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz Univ, Radiol & Med Imaging Dept, Coll Appl Med Sci, Kharj, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Elastography; Ultrasound; Muscles; Medical imaging; Reliability; ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY; CLINICAL-USE; WFUMB GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; ELASTIC PROPERTIES; BREAST MASSES; RECOMMENDATIONS; MUSCLE; SONOELASTOGRAPHY; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00256-019-03300-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To determine inter- and intra-reader reproducibility of shear wave elastography measurements for musculoskeletal soft tissue masses. Materials and methods In all, 64 patients with musculoskeletal soft tissue masses were scanned by two readers prior to biopsy; each taking five measurements of shear wave velocity (m/s) and stiffness (kPa). A single lesion per patient was scanned in transverse and cranio-caudal planes. Depth measurements (cm) and volume (cm(3)) were recorded for each lesion, for each reader. Linear mixed modelling was performed to assess limits of agreement (LOA), inter- and intra-reader repeatability, including analyses for measured depth and volume. Results Of the 64 lesions scanned, 24 (38%) were malignant. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated negligible bias with wide LOA for all measurements. Transverse velocity was the most reliable measure-intraclass correlation (95% CI) = 0.917 (0.886, 1)-though reader 1 measures could be between 38% lower and 57% higher than reader 2 [ratio-scale bias (95% LOA) = 0.99 (0.64, 1.55)]. Repeatability coefficients indicated most disagreement resulted from poor within-reader reproducibility. LOA between readers calculated from means of five repeated measurements were narrower-transverse velocity ratio-scale bias (95% LOA) = 1.00 (0.74, 1.35). Depth affected both estimated velocity and repeatability; volume also affected repeatability. Conclusion This study found poor repeatability of measurements with wide LOA due mostly to intra-reader variability. Transverse velocity was the most reliable measure; variability may be affected by lesion depth. At least five measurements should be reported with LOA to assist future comparability between shear wave elastography systems in evaluating soft tissue masses.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 786
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   The effect of unit, depth, and probe load on the reliability of muscle shear wave elastography: Variables affecting reliability of SWE [J].
Alfuraih, Abdulrahman M. ;
O'Connor, Philip ;
Hensor, Elizabeth ;
Tan, Ai Lyn ;
Emery, Paul ;
Wakefield, Richard J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2018, 46 (02) :108-115
[2]   An investigation into the variability between different shear wave elastography systems in muscle [J].
Alfuraih, Abdulrahman M. ;
O'Connor, Phil ;
Tan, Ai Lyn ;
Hensor, Elizabeth M. A. ;
Emery, Paul ;
Wakefield, Richard J. .
MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2017, 19 (04) :392-400
[3]  
[Anonymous], EFFICACY SHEAR WAVE
[4]   WFUMB GUIDELINES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL USE OF ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY: PART 2: BREAST [J].
Barr, Richard G. ;
Nakashima, Kazutaka ;
Amy, Dominique ;
Cosgrove, David ;
Farrokh, Andre ;
Schafer, Fritz ;
Bamber, Jeffrey C. ;
Castera, Laurent ;
Choi, Byung Ihn ;
Chou, Yi-Hong ;
Dietrich, Christoph F. ;
Ding, Hong ;
Ferraioli, Giovanna ;
Filice, Carlo ;
Friedrich-Rust, Mireen ;
Hall, Timothy J. ;
Nightingale, Kathryn R. ;
Palmeri, Mark L. ;
Shiina, Tsuyoshi ;
Suzuki, Shinichi ;
Sporea, Ioan ;
Wilson, Stephanie ;
Kudo, Masatoshi .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 41 (05) :1148-1160
[5]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[6]  
Carstensen B., Int J Biostat, DOI [10.2202/1557-4679.1107, DOI 10.2202/1557-4679.1107]
[7]   Ultrasound shear wave velocity in skeletal muscle: A reproducibility study [J].
Cortez, C. Dorado ;
Hermitte, L. ;
Ramain, A. ;
Mesmann, C. ;
Lefort, T. ;
Pialat, J. B. .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2016, 97 (01) :71-79
[8]   WFUMB GUIDELINES AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE CLINICAL USE OF ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY: PART 4. THYROID [J].
Cosgrove, David ;
Barr, Richard ;
Bojunga, Joerg ;
Cantisani, Vito ;
Chammas, Maria Cristina ;
Dighe, Manjiri ;
Vinayak, Sudhir ;
Xu, Jun-Mei ;
Dietrich, Christoph F. .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 43 (01) :4-26
[9]   Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible [J].
Cosgrove, David O. ;
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Dore, Caroline J. ;
Skyba, Danny M. ;
Henry, Jean-Pierre ;
Gay, Joel ;
Cohen-Bacrie, Claude .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (05) :1023-1032
[10]   ARTIFACTS IN SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY IMAGES OF THYROID NODULES [J].
Dighe, Manjiri ;
Hippe, Daniel S. ;
Thiel, Jeff .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 44 (06) :1170-1176