Use of cine magnetic resonance angiography in quantifying aneurysm pulsatility associated with endoleak

被引:25
作者
Faries, PL
Agarwal, G
Lookstein, R
Bernheim, JW
Cayne, NS
Cadot, H
Goldman, J
Kent, KC
Hollier, LH
Marin, NL
机构
[1] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med Sch, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00944-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Persistent aneurysm perfusion or endoleak is associated with pulsatility of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) after endovascular repair. However, the resultant pulsatile change in aneurysm diameter may be difficult to quantify, and therefore its significance is unknown. In this study cine magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) was used to quantify aneurysm wall motion during the cardiac cycle and to correlate it with the presence and type of endoleak. Methods: Cine MRA was performed in 16 patients undergoing endovascular repair of AAA. A 1.5 T magnet and post-processing with GEMS 4.0 Fiesta computerized video image analysis software were used to calculate maximum aortic diameter during systole and diastole. Changes in aortic diameter were determined from these measurements. Cine MRA was performed on aneurysms before treatment and in patients with and without endoleak after endovascular repair. Type of endoleak was confirmed at angiography in all cases. Four patients had antegrade (type I) endoleak, and eight patients had retrograde (type II) endoleak; no endoleak was present in four patients. Endovascular grafts with stent support throughout the entire length of the graft (Talent) were used in all cases (14 bifurcated grafts, 2 tube grafts). Results: Cine MRA demonstrated significantly greater wall motion and resultant change in aneurysm diameter in patients with type I endoleak compared with patients without endoleak (type I, 2.14. +/- 1.28 mm vs no endoleak, 0.12 +/- 0.09 mm, P = .001). Change in aneurysm diameter in patients with type II endoleak was not significantly greater than in patients with no endoleak (type II, 0.26 +/- 0.21 mm vs no endoleak, 0.12 +/- 0.09 mm, P = NS). Untreated aneurysms demonstrated the greatest change in diameter during the cardiac cycle (3.51 +/- 0.79 mm). Conclusion: Cine MRA may be used to accurately quantify AAA wall motion before and after endovascular stent-graft treatment. The extent of change in diameter corresponds to the type of endoleak, with antegrade (type I) endoleak generating greater pulsatile change in diameter than retrograde-collateral (type II) endoleak or no endoleak. Cine MRA may provide a noninvasive means of assessing the success of endovascular treatment of AAA. Further studies will be necessary to confirm the utility and efficacy of cine MRA in postoperative assessment of endovascular aneurysm repair.
引用
收藏
页码:652 / 656
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Baum, RA ;
Carpenter, RP ;
Cope, C ;
Golden, MA ;
Velazquez, OC ;
Neschis, DG ;
Mitchell, ME ;
Barker, CF ;
Fairman, RM .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (01) :32-40
[2]   Causes and outcomes of open conversion and aneurysm rupture after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Can type II endoleaks be dangerous? [J].
Buth, J ;
Harris, PL ;
van Marrewijk, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2002, 194 (01) :S98-S102
[3]   The value of the oblique groin incision for femoral artery access during endovascular procedures [J].
Caiati, JM ;
Kaplan, D ;
Gitlitz, D ;
Hollier, LH ;
Marin, ML .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 14 (03) :248-253
[4]   Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Chaikof, EL ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Harris, PL ;
White, GH ;
Zarins, CK ;
Bernhard, VM ;
Matsumura, JS ;
May, J ;
Veith, FJ ;
Fillinger, MF ;
Rutherford, RB ;
Kent, KC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) :1048-1060
[5]   In vivo noninvasive detection and age definition of arterial thrombus by MRI [J].
Corti, R ;
Osende, JI ;
Fayad, ZA ;
Fallon, JT ;
Fuster, V ;
Mizsei, G ;
Dickstein, E ;
Drayer, B ;
Badimon, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (08) :1366-1373
[6]   LIMITATIONS OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN SURVEILLANCE OF SMALL ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSMS [J].
ELLIS, M ;
POWELL, JT ;
GREENHALGH, RM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (05) :614-616
[7]  
Faries PL, 1997, J ENDOVASC SURG, V4, P290, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1997)004<0290:AEMFTA>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
FARIES PL, IN PRESS ANN VASC SU
[10]   Algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of endoleaks [J].
Karch, LA ;
Henretta, JP ;
Hodgson, KJ ;
Mattos, MA ;
Ramsey, DE ;
McLafferty, RB ;
Sumner, DS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 178 (03) :225-231