Thirty-day mortality and late survival with reinterventions and readmissions after open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries

被引:103
作者
Giles, Kristina A. [1 ]
Landon, Bruce E. [2 ]
Cotterill, Philip [3 ,4 ]
O'Malley, A. James [2 ]
Pomposelli, Frank B. [1 ]
Schermerhorn, Marc L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Ctr Medicare, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Ctr Medicaid Serv, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2010.08.051
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Late survival is similar after open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR), despite a perioperative benefit with EVAR. AAA-related reinterventions are more common after EVAR., whereas laparotomy-related reinterventions are more common after open repair. The effect of reinterventions on survival, however, is unknown. We therefore evaluated the rate of reinterventions and readmission after initial AAA repair, 30-day mortality, and the effect on long-term survival. Methods: We identified AAA-related and laparotomy-related reinterventions for propensity score-matched cohorts of 45,652 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing EVAR and open repair from 2001 to 2004. Follow-up was up to 6 years. Hospitalizations for ruptured AAA without repair and for bowel obstruction or ventral hernia without abdominal surgery were also recorded. Event rates were calculated per year and are presented through 6 years of follow-up as events per 100 person-years. Thirty-day mortality was calculated for each reintervention or readmission. Results: Through 6 years, overall reinterventions or readmissions were similar between repair methods but slightly more common after EVAR (7.6 vs 7.0/100 person-years; relative risk [RR], 1.1; P <.001). Overall 30-day mortality with any reintervention or readmission was 9.1%. EVAR patients had more ruptures (0.50 vs 0.09 [RR, 5.7; P <.001]), with a mortality of 28%, but these were uncommon. EVAR patients also had more AAA-related reinterventions through 6 years (3.7 vs 0.9 [RR, 4.0; P <.001]; mortality, 5.6%), most of which were minor endovascular reinterventions (2.4 vs 0.2 [RR, 11.4; P <.001]), with a 30-day mortality of 3.0%. However, minor open (0.8 vs 0.5 [RR, 1.4; P<.001]; mortality, 6.9%) and major reinterventions (0.4 vs 0.2 [RR, 2.4; P <.001]; mortality, 12.1%) were also more common after EVAR than open repair. Conversely, EVAR patients had fewer laparotomy-related reinterventions than open patients (1.4 vs 3.0 [RR, 0.5; P <.001]; mortality, 8.1%) and readmissions without surgery (2.0 vs 2.7 [RR, 0.7; P<.0011; mortality 10.9%). Overall, reinterventions or readmission accounted for 9.6% of all EVAR deaths and 7.6% of all open repair deaths in the follow-up period (P <.001). Conclusions: Reintervention and readmission are slightly higher after EVAR. Survival is negatively affected by reintervention or readmission after EVAR and open surgery, which likely contributes to the erosion of the survival benefit of EVAR over time. ( J Vasc Surg 2011;53:6-13.)
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 13
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Blankensteijn, JD ;
de Jong, SECA ;
Prinssen, M ;
van der Ham, AC ;
Buth, J ;
van Sterkenburg, SMM ;
Verhagen, HJM ;
Buskens, E ;
Grobbee, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (23) :2398-2405
[2]   Long-term outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - The first decade [J].
Brewster, David C. ;
Jones, John E. ;
Chung, Thomas K. ;
Lamuraglia, Glenn M. ;
Kwolek, Christopher J. ;
Watkins, Michael T. ;
Hodgman, Thomas M. ;
Cambria, Richard P. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (03) :426-438
[3]   Risk prediction for perioperative mortality of endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using the Medicare population [J].
Giles, Kristina A. ;
Schermerhorn, Marc L. ;
O'Malley, A. James ;
Cotterill, Philip ;
Jhaveri, Ami ;
Pomposelli, Frank B. ;
Landon, Bruce E. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (02) :256-262
[4]   Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial [J].
Greenhalgh, RM ;
Brown, LC ;
Epstein, D ;
Kwong, GPS ;
Powell, JT ;
Sculpher, MJ ;
Thompson, SG .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9478) :2179-2186
[5]   Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial [J].
Greenhalgh, RM ;
Brown, LC ;
Kwong, GPS ;
Powell, JT ;
Thompson, SG .
LANCET, 2004, 364 (9437) :843-848
[6]   Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: The EUROSTAR experience [J].
Harris, PL ;
Vallabhaneni, SR ;
Desgranges, P ;
Bacquemin, JP ;
van Marrewijk, C ;
Laheij, RJF .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 32 (04) :739-749
[7]  
Hobo R, 2008, J ENDOVASC THER, V14, P1
[8]   Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm - Round two [J].
Lederle, FA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (23) :2443-2445
[9]   Outcomes Following Endovascular vs Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm A Randomized Trial [J].
Lederle, Frank A. ;
Freischlag, Julie A. ;
Kyriakides, Tassos C. ;
Padberg, Frank T., Jr. ;
Matsumura, Jon S. ;
Kohler, Ted R. ;
Lin, Peter H. ;
Jean-Claude, Jessie M. ;
Cikrit, Dolores F. ;
Swanson, Kathleen M. ;
Peduzzi, Peter N. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (14) :1535-1542
[10]   Diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm and outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair: Does size matter? A report from EUROSTAR [J].
Peppelenbosch, N ;
Buth, J ;
Harris, PL ;
van Marrewijk, C ;
Fransen, G .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 39 (02) :288-297