Industrial Intellectual Property as the EU's Innovative Development Factor

被引:0
作者
Soldatenko, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] MGIMO Univ, Moscow State Inst Int Relat, Dept Int Econ Relat & Foreign Econ Affairs, Sci Econ, 76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow 119454, Russia
来源
CONTEMPORARY EUROPE-SOVREMENNAYA EVROPA | 2021年 / 04期
关键词
EU; intellectual property; industrial property; trademark; patent for invention; innovation system;
D O I
10.15211/soveurope42021107118
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
The article addresses correlation between the use of different intellectual property objects and the general goals of innovation policy of the EU. The subject of the research is industrial intellectual property along with trademarks and patents for inventions. The research period is limited to 2010-2019. Based on the data from annual European innovation board and analysis of the dynamics of the activity of the EU member states in the field of intellectual property, the author identifies a group of EU countries that have the biggest potential in the use of the stipulated industrial property. It is show that trademark protection is mostly used in the medium and high-tech industries of the sample countries. However, there is a certain differentiation in the scale and dynamics of its application. Moreover, the author points out a high interest of the third countries such as USA, Japan and China in obtaining competitive advantages in the EU market through registration of a trademark in the European Union intellectual property office. The unified patent system in the EU is still at the preliminary stage as the most used national patent systems within the EU are the German and the French ones. The analysis demonstrates advantages of intellectual property systems in the Netherlands and Sweden. The author concludes that the successful implementation of the EU innovation policy through the creation of a system of exclusive industrial property rights is under way.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 118
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   AI AND COPYRIGHTS: PERSPECTIVES ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS OF THE EU, THE US, AND VIETNAM [J].
Le Thi, Minh .
LEX HUMANA, 2024, 16 (01) :297-327
[32]   Potable intellectual property: WTO TRIPS and EU geographical indication wines [J].
Curzi, Daniele ;
Huysmans, Martijn ;
Haase, Oliver Ken .
APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2024, 46 (03) :1065-1082
[33]   Intellectual property education for sustainable development of the society [J].
Uchida, Haru-Hisa ;
Ohtsuka, Aki ;
Sumida, Masayoshi .
Fourth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Proceedings, 2005, :76-77
[34]   Intellectual Property and Development after the TRIPS Agreement [J].
Buitrago Diaz, Esperanza .
PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL, 2009, (12) :63-90
[36]   INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE PARADIGM OF THE SOCIOCULTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF A SOCIETY [J].
Byrkovych, Tetyana .
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MANAGERIAL STAFF OF CULTURE AND ARTS HERALD, 2018, (02) :8-10
[37]   Development and Intellectual Property Construction of Internet of Things [J].
Yuan, Shu .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND HUMANITIES SCIENCE (ETMHS 2015), 2015, 27 :819-822
[38]   Development of intellectual property laws for the Russian Federation [J].
O'Connor, Thomas S. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2011, 64 (09) :1011-1016
[39]   The teacher’s outrageous claim of “intellectual property” [J].
David Wiley .
TechTrends, 2001, 45 (1) :51-52
[40]   Research on Intellectual Property Risk and Precautionary Education in the Process of Undergraduate Innovative Undertaking [J].
Hu Shensong .
2017 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION THROUGH TECHNOLOGY (EITT), 2017, :57-60