Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment options for small and decentralized communities

被引:103
作者
Machado, A. P.
Urbano, L.
Brito, A. G.
Janknecht, P.
Salas, J. J.
Nogueira, R.
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Inst Biotechnol & Bioengn, Ctr Biol Engn, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[2] Stadtwerke Dusseldorf AG, Wasserwirtschaft & Tech Himmelgeister, D-40589 Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Ctr Nuevas Tecnol Agua, Seville 41092, Spain
关键词
activated sludge; constructed wetland; life cycle assessment; slow rate infiltration; wastewater treatment;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2007.497
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability has strong implications on the practice of engineering. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an appropriate methodology for assessing the sustainability of a wastewater treatment plant design. The present study used a LCA approach for comparing alternative wastewater treatment processes for small and decentralised rural communities. The assessment was focused on two energy-saving systems (constructed wetland and slow rate infiltration) and a conventional one (activated sludge process). The low environmental impact of the energy-saving wastewater treatment plants was demonstrated, the most relevant being the global warming indicator. Options for reduction of life cycle impacts were assessed including materials used in construction and operational lifetime of the systems. A 10% extension of operation lifetime of constructed wetland and slow rate infiltration systems led to a 1% decrease in CO2 emissions, in both systems. The decrease in the abiotic depletion was 5 and 7%, respectively. Also, replacing steel with HDPE in the activated sludge tank resulted in a 1% reduction in CO2 emission and 1% in the abiotic depletion indicator. In the case of the Imhoff tank a 1% reduction in CO2 emissions and 5% in the abiotic depletion indicator were observed when concrete was replaced by HDPE.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 22
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENV ISSUES SERIES
[2]   Life Cycle Assessment: Comparing strategic options for the mains infrastructure - Part I [J].
Dennison, FJ ;
Azapagic, A ;
Clift, R ;
Colbourne, JS .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 39 (10-11) :315-319
[3]   Assessing the environmental impact of two options for small-scale wastewater treatment: comparing a reedbed and an aerated biological filter using a life cycle approach [J].
Dixon, A ;
Simon, M ;
Burkitt, T .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 20 (04) :297-308
[4]  
EMMERSON RHC, 1995, J CHART INST WATER E, V9, P317
[5]   Establishing the true costs and benefits of environmental protection and enhancement in the aquatic environment [J].
Gaterell, MR ;
Lester, JN .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 249 (1-3) :25-37
[6]  
ISO, 2006, 14040 ENV MANAGEMENT
[7]   LCA of Concrete and Steel Building Frames [J].
Jonsson, Asa ;
Bjorklund, Thomas ;
Tillman, Anne-Marie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 1998, 3 (04) :216-224
[8]   Life cycle assessment of wastewater systems: Influence of system boundaries and scale on calculated environmental loads [J].
Lundin, M ;
Bengtsson, M ;
Molander, S .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (01) :180-186
[9]   Sustainable development indicators for wastewater systems - researchers and indicator users in a co-operative case study [J].
Palme, U ;
Lundin, M ;
Tillman, AM ;
Molander, S .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2005, 43 (03) :293-311
[10]  
*PRE CONS, 2006, SIMAPRO INTR LCA SIM