Active Disturbance Rejection Control in fully distributed Automatic Generation Control with co-simulation of communication delay

被引:20
|
作者
Han, Wenjie [1 ]
Wang, Gang [1 ]
Stankovic, Alex M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Elect & Comp Engn Dept, Medford, MA 02155 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Active Disturbance Rejection Control; Ultra-local model; Fully distributed Automatic-Generation Control; Co-simulation; Cyber physical systems; LOAD FREQUENCY CONTROL; CONTROL DESIGN; ADRC;
D O I
10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.01.016
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper compares Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC), Proportional-Integral (PI) and ultra-local adaptive controller (also labeled intelligent-PID) when applied to Automatic Generation Control (AGC) for a multi-area power system with co-simulation of the communication system. The co-simulation platform PiccSIM integrates Simulink/Matlab and Network Simulator Ver. 2 (NS2) with real-time simulation data exchanged through Local Area Network (LAN). Instead of the traditional control center, automatic generation controller is embedded in each participating generation unit locally to avoid communication delay for the control signals. This new control scheme is referred to as fully distributed AGC. The performance of the proposed scheme is tested on a nonlinear model of New England (NE) 39-bus system with the co-simulated tie-line power flow communication delays. The simulation results present very promising performance and good robustness of ADRC in the presence of communication delays, suggesting that the stability of the overall cyber-physical system is enhanced significantly.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 234
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of Ultra-Local Models in Automatic Generation Control with Co-Simulation of Communication Delay
    Han, Wenjie
    Wang, Gang
    Stankovic, Alex M.
    2017 NORTH AMERICAN POWER SYMPOSIUM (NAPS), 2017,
  • [2] Predictive generalised active disturbance rejection for load frequency control with communication delay
    Jain, Shivam
    Hote, Yogesh, V
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL, 2023, 45 (11) : 2027 - 2042
  • [3] Predictive Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Processes with Delay
    Zheng Qinling
    Gao Zhiqiang
    2013 32ND CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2013, : 4108 - 4113
  • [4] Active Disturbance Rejection Control Design for Variable Pitch of Wind Generation with Simulation
    Zhou, Wenqian
    Zhao, Huimin
    Xie, Qiyue
    Cheng, Zhi
    Xie, Youcheng
    Zhu, Yonghai
    2020 CHINESE AUTOMATION CONGRESS (CAC 2020), 2020, : 5651 - 5656
  • [5] Internal Model Control Using Active Disturbance Rejection Control with Time Delay
    Ikemoto, Naoaki
    Tanaka, Ryo
    Ishida, Yoshihisa
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE (TENCON), 2016, : 3398 - 3401
  • [6] Master for Simulation Control using the Distributed Co-Simulation Protocol
    Krammer, Martin
    Benedikt, Martin
    2018 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS (INDIN), 2018, : 329 - 334
  • [7] Predictive active disturbance rejection control for processes with time delay
    Zheng, Qinling
    Gao, Zhiqiang
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2014, 53 (04) : 873 - 881
  • [8] Analysis of Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Processes with Time Delay
    Tan, Wen
    Fu, Caifen
    2015 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2015, : 3962 - 3967
  • [9] Application of Active Disturbance Rejection Control Technology in Distributed Control System of Coal-fired Power Generation
    Huang Huanpao
    Nie Ling
    Pan Gang
    Xia Ming
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2010, : 6091 - 6094
  • [10] Active disturbance rejection distributed secondary control for DC microgrids
    Li, Jianlin
    You, Honghao
    Liu, Shuo
    Li, Xingchen
    Ding, Ziyang
    Zou, Fei
    HIGH VOLTAGE, 2024, 9 (01) : 241 - 251