Modeling of plasma and entrained flow co-gasification of MSW and petroleum sludge

被引:64
作者
Mazzoni, Luca [1 ]
Janajreh, Isam [1 ]
Elagroudy, Sherien [2 ]
Ghenai, Chaouki [3 ]
机构
[1] Khalifa Univ Sci & Technol, Mech & Mat Engn Dept, Abu Dhabi 54224, U Arab Emirates
[2] Ain Shams Univ, Egypt Solid Waste Management Ctr Excellence, 1 Elsarayt St, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Univ Sharjah, Sustainable & Renewable Energy Engn Dept, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Plasma gasification; IGCC; IPGCC; Cold gas efficiency; Waste-to-energy; Plasma gas sensitivity; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; BIOMASS; SIMULATION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; GASIFIER;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2020.117001
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this work two thermochemical conversion technologies are compared, i.e. plasma and entrained flow co-gasification of municipal-solid-waste (MSW) and Petroleum hydrocarbon waste (PHW). In the Gulf States, the MSW is mainly landfilled while PHW is subjected to specialized and rather expensive treatment. Here, the plasma gasification is compared to the conventional entrained flow technology in an equilibrium-based gasification model. The two models are developed in Aspen Plus representing an Integrated- Plasma and entrained flow Gasification Combined Cycles, i.e. IPGCC, and IGCC. Initially, the two feedstock were characterized via proximate and ultimate analyses. Then, IPGCC and IGCC are evaluated under variable oxygen-air ratio and MSW + PHW mixtures. On the basis of Abu Dhabi daily generation of 1338 tons of mixed waste consisting of 90% MSW and 10% PHW, one can generate 81 MWE at 33.6% efficiency using IPGCC plant compared to 100.2 MWE at 41.4% efficiency using conventional IGCC. Surprisingly, the gasification metrics including cold gasification (CGE), syngas molar fraction and their heating value are favoring the plasma technology. The results reveal 75% CGE for IGPCC vs 73% for IGCC at the highest oxygen ratio and 50% mixture fraction. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Numerical Modeling of the Entrained Flow Gasification (EFG) of Kentucky Coal and Biomass
    Adeyemi, Idowu
    Arink, Thomas
    Janajreh, Isam
    CLEAN, EFFICIENT AND AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2015, 75 : 232 - 239
  • [32] Effect of co-gasification of biomass and petroleum coke with coal on the production of gases
    Fermoso, Javier
    Arias, Borja
    Moghtaderi, Behdad
    Pevida, Covadonga
    Plaza, Marta G.
    Pis, Jose J.
    Rubiera, Fernando
    GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 2 (04): : 304 - 313
  • [33] Co-gasification reactivity of petroleum coke with coal and coal liquefaction residue
    Ren, Liwei
    Wei, Ruidi
    Zhu, Tingchun
    JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE, 2020, 93 (01) : 436 - 441
  • [34] Crystallization and viscosity-temperature characteristics during co-gasification of industrial sludge and coal
    Zhang, Linmin
    Liu, Bin
    Wei, Juntao
    Song, Xudong
    Bai, Yonghui
    Wang, Jiaofei
    Zhou, Ying
    Yang, Huijun
    Yu, Guangsuo
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY, 2022, 16 (06) : 1037 - 1047
  • [35] Molecular dynamics investigation on the co-gasification of various components of sewage sludge in supercritical water
    Hao, Wen Qi
    Liu, Xiang Jun
    FUEL, 2023, 334
  • [36] High-pressure co-gasification of coal with biomass and petroleum coke
    Fermoso, J.
    Arias, B.
    Plaza, M. G.
    Pevida, C.
    Rubiera, F.
    Pis, J. J.
    Garcia-Pena, F.
    Casero, P.
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 90 (7-8) : 926 - 932
  • [37] Assessment of sewage sludge as a component for the tire char co-gasification process
    Spiewak, K.
    Czerski, G.
    Grzywacz, P.
    Makowska, D.
    ENERGY, 2024, 308
  • [38] Study on Steam Co-Gasification of Waste Tire Char and Sewage Sludge
    Czerski, Grzegorz
    Spiewak, Katarzyna
    Makowska, Dorota
    Grycova, Barbora
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (05)
  • [39] Steam co-gasification of horticultural waste and sewage sludge: Product distribution, synergistic analysis and optimization
    Hu, Qiang
    Dai, Yanjun
    Wang, Chi-Hwa
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 301
  • [40] CO2 gasification behavior of biomass chars in an entrained flow reactor
    Kirtania, Kawnish
    Bhattacharya, Sankar
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2016, 6 (01) : 49 - 59