Prevalence and risk factors for cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
作者
Li, Qiujiang [1 ,2 ]
Long, Xingxia [3 ]
Shi, Lin [4 ]
Wang, Yinbin [2 ]
Guan, Tao [2 ]
Lv, Jinhan [2 ]
Cai, Lijun [2 ]
机构
[1] Ningxia Med Univ, Yinchuan, Ningxia, Peoples R China
[2] Peoples Hosp Ningxia Hui Autonomous Reg, Dept Orthoped, 56 Zhengyuan St, Yinchuan 750002, Ningxia, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Tradit Chinese Med Hosp Dianjiang Chongqing, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
cage subsidence; lumbar interbody fusion; meta-analysis; risk factors; systematic review; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000028085
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is an effective treatment for lumbar degenerative diseases. Cage subsidence (CS) contitutes one of the most common postoperative complications. Many risk factors for CS after LIF have been reported in some studies. However, controversies still exist. The objective of this study will be to summarize data on the prevalence and risk factors of CS after LIF. Methods and analysis: Our study present a protocol that conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors for CS after LIF. Two reviewers retrieved the relevant articles using the 5 databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) from inception to May 31st, 2021. Primary outcome will be the prevalence of CS after LIF. Second outcomes include the risk factors associated with postoperative CS and clinical outcomes associated with postoperative CS. Three reviewers will screen citation titles and abstracts and evaluated full-text of each potentially relevant citation, and then extracted the data using a data extraction form. Any discrepancies in decisions between reviewers will be resolved through discussion. We assessed the methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). The aim of the extra analysis is to explore the explanations of the heterogeneity (age, gender, race, year of publication, type of study and surgical procedure). Publication bias will be assessed by Begg test, Egger test and funnel plots.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages
    Choi, JY
    Sung, KH
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [2] Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Historical Overview and a Future Perspective
    de Kunder, Suzanne L.
    Rijkers, Kim
    Caelers, Inge J. M. H.
    de Bie, Rob A.
    Koehler, Peter J.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (16) : 1161 - 1168
  • [3] Risk Factors for Posterior Cage Migration after Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery
    Lee, Dong-Yeong
    Park, Young-Jin
    Song, Sang-Youn
    Jeong, Soon-Taek
    Kim, Dong-Hee
    [J]. ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (01) : 59 - 68
  • [4] Effects of Different Orientations of Cage Implantation on Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Liang, Yan
    Zhao, Yongfei
    Xu, Shuai
    Zhu, Zhenqi
    Liu, Haiying
    Mao, Keya
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 140 : E97 - E104
  • [5] Comparison of three different posterior fixation techniques in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for two-level lumbar degenerative diseases: At a mean follow up time of 46 months
    Liu, Fubing
    Cao, Yuanwu
    Feng, Zhenzhou
    Zhou, Xiaogang
    Jiang, Chun
    Li, Xilei
    Chen, Zixian
    Li, Zheng
    Liang, Yun
    Jiang, Xiaoxing
    Dong, Jian
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 141 : 1 - 6
  • [6] Modic Changes (MCs) Associated with Endplate Sclerosis Can Prevent Cage Subsidence in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) Stand -Alone
    Liu, Junhui
    Ding, Wenyuan
    Yang, Dalong
    Wu, Hao
    Hao, Lu
    Hu, Zhijun
    Fan, Shunwu
    Zhao, Fengdong
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 138 : E160 - E168
  • [7] Subsidence Rates After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
    Macki, Mohamed
    Anand, Sharath Kumar
    Surapaneni, Ashwin
    Park, Paul
    Chang, Victor
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 : 599 - 606
  • [8] Risk Factors for Poor Patient-reported Quality of Life Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion An Analysis of 2-Year Follow-up
    Makino, Takahiro
    Kaito, Takashi
    Fujiwara, Hiroyasu
    Honda, Hirotsugu
    Sakai, Yusuke
    Takenaka, Shota
    Yoshikawa, Hideki
    Yonenobu, Kazuo
    [J]. SPINE, 2017, 42 (19) : 1502 - 1510
  • [9] Lumbar interbody fusion: recent advances in surgical techniques and bone healing strategies
    Meng, Bin
    Bunch, Joshua
    Burton, Douglas
    Wang, Jinxi
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 30 (01) : 22 - 33
  • [10] Comparative effectiveness and safety of posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Coflex, Wallis, and X-stop for lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Mo, Zhuomao
    Li, Dong
    Zhang, Renwen
    Chang, Minmin
    Yang, Binbin
    Tang, Shujie
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 172 : 74 - 81