Revalidation of the Federal PTRA: Testing the PTRA for Predictive Biases

被引:24
作者
Cohen, Thomas H. [1 ]
Lowenkamp, Christopher T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Adm Off US Courts, One Columbus Circle NE, Washington, DC 20544 USA
关键词
pretrial risk assessment instrument; federal pretrial release; recidivism prediction; predictive bias; RISK; ETHNICITY; VALIDITY; RACE;
D O I
10.1177/0093854818810315
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The pretrial risk assessment instrument (PTRA) was developed for use in the U.S. federal pretrial system. Specifically, this instrument was constructed to help officers assess the likelihood that defendants will commit pretrial violations including being rearrested for new crimes, missing court appearances, or being revoked while on pretrial release. This research evaluates the PTRA's capacity to predict pretrial violations on 85,369 defendants with officer-completed PTRA assessments. Bivariate and multivariate models were estimated by race, ethnicity, and sex. Results show that the PTRA performs well at predicting pretrial violations as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.65 to 0.73 depending upon the subsamples and outcomes being predicted. Moreover, the PTRA predicted new criminal arrest activity equally well for non-Hispanic Whites and Blacks, while for Hispanics and females, findings show the instrument validly predicting rearrest activity, with some evidence of overprediction depending upon the outcome being examined.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 260
页数:27
相关论文
共 68 条
[51]  
Mayson SG, 2018, YALE LAW J, V127, P490
[52]   Age, Risk Assessment, and Sanctioning: Overestimating the Old, Underestimating the Young [J].
Monahan, John ;
Skeem, Jennifer ;
Lowenkamp, Christopher .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 41 (02) :191-201
[53]  
Oleson J.C., 2014, Federal Probation, V78, P12
[54]  
Pepin A.W., 2013, Evidence-based pretrial release: Final paper
[55]   Assessing the race-crime and ethnicity-crime relationship in a sample of serious adolescent delinquents [J].
Piquero, Alex R. ;
Brame, Robert W. .
CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2008, 54 (03) :390-422
[56]   Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies:: ROC area, Cohen's d, and r [J].
Rice, ME ;
Harris, GT .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2005, 29 (05) :615-620
[57]   A cautionary note on the use of actuarial risk assessment tools for social control [J].
Silver, E ;
Miller, LL .
CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2002, 48 (01) :138-161
[58]   Gender, Risk Assessment, and Sanctioning: The Cost of Treating Women Like Men [J].
Skeem, Jennifer ;
Monahan, John ;
Lowenkamp, Christopher .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 40 (05) :580-593
[59]   RISK, RACE, AND RECIDIVISM: PREDICTIVE BIAS AND DISPARATE IMPACT [J].
Skeem, Jennifer L. ;
Lowenkamp, Christopher T. .
CRIMINOLOGY, 2016, 54 (04) :680-712
[60]  
Smith P., 2009, Criminology Public Policy, V8, P183, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-9133.2009.00551.X