A framework for distinguishing benign from malignant breast histopathological images using deep residual networks

被引:5
作者
Gandomkar, Ziba [1 ]
Brennan, Patrick C. [1 ]
Mello-Thoms, Claudia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Image Optimisat & Percept, Discipline Med Imaging & Radiat Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Informat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
来源
14TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI 2018) | 2018年 / 10718卷
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast pathology; Deep learning; Deep residual network; Histopathological images; CANCER; BIOPSY; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1117/12.2318320
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Studies have shown that there are discrepancies among pathologists in the classification of breast histopathological slides. In this study we propose a framework for categorizing hematoxylin-eosin stained breast images either as benign or malignant at four magnification factors, and then aggregating the classification results of a patient's images from different magnification factors to make the ultimate diagnosis for each patient. We used a publicly available database, containing 7786 images from 81 patients. The images were acquired in four visual magnification factors, namely x40, x100, x200, and x400, with an effective pixel size of 0.49 mu m, 0.20 mu m, 0.10 mu m, and 0.05 mu m respectively. In order to mitigate the inconsistencies in the color of the images, stain normalization was performed. Next, for each magnification factor, a deep residual network (ResNet) with 152 layers has been trained for classifying patches from the images as benign or malignant. Then, a meta-decision tree was used to combine classification results of a patient's images from different magnification factors to provide a patient-level diagnosis. The ResNets achieved correct classification rates (CCR) of 98.52%, 97.90%, 98.33%, and 97.66% at x40, x100, x200, and x400 magnification factors, respectively. For classification of patients either as benign or malignant, a CCR of 98.77% was obtained. In conclusion, our study showed that the proposed framework can be helpful in the categorization of breast digital slides.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   AggNet: Deep Learning From Crowds for Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images [J].
Albarqouni, Shadi ;
Baur, Christoph ;
Achilles, Felix ;
Belagiannis, Vasileios ;
Demirci, Stefanie ;
Navab, Nassir .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 35 (05) :1313-1321
[2]   Understanding diagnostic variability in breast pathology: lessons learned from an expert consensus review panel [J].
Allison, Kimberly H. ;
Reisch, Lisa M. ;
Carney, Patricia A. ;
Weaver, Donald L. ;
Schnitt, Stuart J. ;
O'Malley, Frances P. ;
Geller, Berta M. ;
Elmore, Joann G. .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 65 (02) :240-251
[3]  
[Anonymous], PROC CVPR IEEE
[4]  
Bedell M B, 1995, J Cancer Educ, V10, P223
[5]   Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images with Deep Neural Networks [J].
Ciresan, Dan C. ;
Giusti, Alessandro ;
Gambardella, Luca M. ;
Schmidhuber, Juergen .
MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2013, PT II, 2013, 8150 :411-418
[6]   Automatic detection of invasive ductal carcinoma in whole slide images with Convolutional Neural Networks [J].
Cruz-Roa, Angel ;
Basavanhally, Ajay ;
Gonzalez, Fabio ;
Gilmore, Hannah ;
Feldman, Michael ;
Ganesan, Shridar ;
Shih, Natalie ;
Tomaszewski, John ;
Madabhushi, Anant .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: DIGITAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 9041
[7]   Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations [J].
Elmore, G ;
Barton, MB ;
Moceri, VM ;
Polk, S ;
Arena, PJ ;
Fletcher, SW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (16) :1089-1096
[8]  
Elmore JG, 2015, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V313, P1122, DOI 10.1001/jama.2015.1405
[9]   PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER .1. THE VALUE OF HISTOLOGICAL GRADE IN BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE STUDY WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
ELSTON, CW ;
ELLIS, IO .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) :403-410
[10]  
Gandomkar Ziba, 2017, J Pathol Inform, V8, P34, DOI 10.4103/jpi.jpi_22_17