Routine saliva testing for the identification of silent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare workers

被引:40
作者
Zhang, Kevin [1 ]
Shoukat, Affan [2 ]
Crystal, William [2 ]
Langley, Joanne M. [3 ,4 ]
Galvani, Alison P. [2 ]
Moghadas, Seyed M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Infect Dis Modeling & Anal CIDMA, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Canadian Ctr Vaccinol, IWK Hlth Ctr, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Nova Scotia Hlth Author, Halifax, NS, Canada
[5] York Univ, Agent Based Modelling Lab, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大健康研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
COVID-19; testing; nasopharyngeal; saliva; case detection; outbreak; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
10.1017/ice.2020.1413
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Current COVID-19 guidelines recommend symptom-based screening and regular nasopharyngeal (NP) testing for healthcare personnel in high-risk settings. We sought to estimate case detection percentages with various routine NP and saliva testing frequencies. Design: Simulation modeling study. Methods: We constructed a sensitivity function based on the average infectiousness profile of symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases to determine the probability of being identified at the time of testing. This function was fitted to reported data on the percent positivity of symptomatic COVID-19 patients using NP testing. We then simulated a routine testing program with different NP and saliva testing frequencies to determine case detection percentages during the infectious period, as well as the presymptomatic stage. Results: Routine biweekly NP testing, once every 2 weeks, identified an average of 90.7% (SD, 0.18) of cases during the infectious period and 19.7% (SD, 0.98) during the presymptomatic stage. With a weekly NP testing frequency, the corresponding case detection percentages were 95.9% (SD, 0.18) and 32.9% (SD, 1.23), respectively. A 5-day saliva testing schedule had a similar case detection percentage as weekly NP testing during the infectious period, but identified -10% more cases (mean, 42.5%; SD, 1.10) during the presymptomatic stage. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the utility of routine noninvasive saliva testing for frontline healthcare workers to protect vulnerable patient populations. A 5-day saliva testing schedule should be considered to help identify silent infections and prevent outbreaks in nursing homes and healthcare facilities.
引用
收藏
页码:1189 / 1193
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Interim Guidance on Testing and Specimen Collection for Patients with Suspected Infection with Novel Influenza A Viruses with the Potential to Cause Severe Disease in Humans Testing Procedures for Laboratory Personnel | Bird Flu
[2]  
[Anonymous], COVID 19 SCI ADVISOR
[3]  
[Anonymous], CORONAVIRUS DIS 2019
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, COVID 19 QUARANTINE
[5]  
[Anonymous], COVID-19 Map
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, DOI DOI 10.1056/NEJMOA2001316
[7]  
[Anonymous], COVID-19 Surveillance
[8]  
[Anonymous], The Use of Alternate Specimen Collection Methods for COVID-19 PCR Testing [Internet]
[9]  
Casey M, 2020, MEDRXIV2020050820094
[10]  
Comas-Herrera A., MORTALITY ASS COVID