Molecular mechanisms of yeast tolerance and in situ detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates

被引:192
作者
Liu, Z. Lewis [1 ]
机构
[1] ARS, Bioenergy Res Unit, Natl Ctr Agr Utilizat Res, USDA, Peoria, IL 61604 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Aldehyde inhibitors; Gene regulatory networks; Genomic adaptation; Lignocellulose-to-ethanol conversion; Reprogrammed pathways; Stress tolerance; BIOMASS CONVERSION INHIBITORS; ZINC CLUSTER PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; ETHANOLOGENIC YEAST; TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION; ALCOHOL-DEHYDROGENASE; MULTIDRUG-RESISTANCE; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PROTEASOME EXPRESSION; REGULATORY NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1007/s00253-011-3167-9
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Pretreatment of lignocellulose biomass for biofuel production generates inhibitory compounds that interfere with microbial growth and subsequent fermentation. Remediation of the inhibitors by current physical, chemical, and biological abatement means is economically impractical, and overcoming the inhibitory effects of lignocellulose hydrolysate poses a significant technical challenge for lower-cost cellulosic ethanol production. Development of tolerant ethanologenic yeast strains has demonstrated the potential of in situ detoxification for numerous aldehyde inhibitors derived from lignocellulose biomass pretreatment and conversion. In the last decade, significant progress has been made in understanding mechanisms of yeast tolerance for tolerant strain development. Enriched genetic backgrounds, enhanced expression, interplays, and global integration of many key genes enable yeast tolerance. Reprogrammed pathways support yeast functions to withstand the inhibitor stress, detoxify the toxic compounds, maintain energy and redox balance, and complete active metabolism for ethanol fermentation. Complex gene interactions and regulatory networks as well as co-regulation are well recognized as involved in yeast adaptation and tolerance. This review presents our current knowledge on mechanisms of the inhibitor detoxification based on molecular studies and genomic-based approaches. Our improved understanding of yeast tolerance and in situ detoxification provide insight into phenotype-genotype relationships, dissection of tolerance mechanisms, and strategies for more tolerant strain development for biofuels applications.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 825
页数:17
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Adaptive response to the antimalarial drug artesunate in yeast involves Pdr1p/Pdr3p-mediated transcriptional activation of the resistance determinants TPO1 and PDR5 [J].
Alenquer, Marta ;
Tenreiro, Sandra ;
Sa-Correia, Isabel .
FEMS YEAST RESEARCH, 2006, 6 (08) :1130-1139
[2]   NADH- vs NADPH-coupled reduction of 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF) and its implications on product distribution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J].
Almeida, Joao R. M. ;
Roder, Anja ;
Modig, Tobias ;
Laadan, Boaz ;
Liden, Gunnar ;
Gorwa-Grauslund, Marie-F. .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2008, 78 (06) :939-945
[3]   Overexpression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription factor and multidrug resistance genes conveys enhanced resistance to lignocellulose-derived fermentation inhibitors [J].
Alriksson, Bjorn ;
Horvath, Ilona Sarvari ;
Jonsson, Leif J. .
PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 45 (02) :264-271
[4]   Stereochemistry of Furfural Reduction by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Aldehyde Reductase That Contributes to In Situ Furfural Detoxification [J].
Bowman, Michael J. ;
Jordan, Douglas B. ;
Vermillion, Karl E. ;
Braker, Jay D. ;
Moon, Jaewoong ;
Liu, Z. Lewis .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 76 (15) :4926-4932
[5]   Fungal heat-shock proteins in human disease [J].
Burnie, JR ;
Carter, TL ;
Hodgetts, SJ ;
Matthews, RC .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2006, 30 (01) :53-88
[6]   SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE 3-METHYLADENINE DNA GLYCOSYLASE HAS HOMOLOGY TO THE ALKA GLYCOSYLASE OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI AND IS INDUCED IN RESPONSE TO DNA ALKYLATION DAMAGE [J].
CHEN, J ;
DERFLER, B ;
SAMSON, L .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1990, 9 (13) :4569-4575
[7]   Dosage suppressors of pds1 implicate ubiquitin-associated domains in checkpoint control [J].
Clarke, DJ ;
Mondesert, G ;
Segal, M ;
Bertolaet, BL ;
Jensen, S ;
Wolff, M ;
Henze, M ;
Reed, SI .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 21 (06) :1997-2007
[8]  
DELAHODDE A, 1995, MOL CELL BIOL, V15, P4043
[9]   CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DNA TARGET SITE FOR THE YEAST ARGR REGULATORY COMPLEX, A SEQUENCE ABLE TO MEDIATE REPRESSION OR INDUCTION BY ARGININE [J].
DERIJCKE, M ;
SENECA, S ;
PUNYAMMALEE, B ;
GLANSDORFF, N ;
CRABEEL, M .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 1992, 12 (01) :68-81
[10]   Genome microarray analysis of transcriptional activation in multidrug resistance yeast mutants [J].
DeRisi, J ;
van den Hazel, B ;
Marc, P ;
Balzi, E ;
Brown, P ;
Jacq, C ;
Goffeau, A .
FEBS LETTERS, 2000, 470 (02) :156-160