Impact of the Affordable Care Act's Physician Payments Sunshine Act on branded statin prescribing

被引:1
作者
Li, Jing [1 ]
Wu, Bingxiao [2 ]
Flory, James [3 ]
Jung, Jeah [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Pharm, Comparat Hlth Outcomes Policy & Econ CHOICE Inst, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Econ, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] George Mason Univ, Dept Hlth Adm & Policy, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Affordable Care Act; disclosure; drug; industry payment; prescribing; Sunshine Act; DIFFERENCE-IN-DIFFERENCES; INDUSTRY; ASSOCIATION; DISCLOSURE; DRUGS;
D O I
10.1111/1475-6773.14024
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To evaluate the impact of the Affordable Care Act's Physician Payments Sunshine Act (PPSA), which mandates disclosure of industry payments to physicians, on physician prescribing of branded statins. Data sources Administrative claims data from 2011 to 2015 from three large national commercial insurers were provided by the Health Care Cost Institute. Study design We adopted a difference-in-differences and event study design, leveraging the control group of physicians in two states, MA and VT, which implemented state laws on disclosure of industry payments prior to the national PPSA. To further address potential confounding caused by differences in prescribing patterns across states, our analytical sample includes physicians practicing in border counties between the treatment (NH, NY, and RI) and control (MA and VT) states. Data collection We restricted our sample to physicians who had at least 50 new-fill prescription claims for statins during the five-year study period, with at least one new-fill prescription claim each year. Principal findings We found that the PPSA led to a 7% (p < 0.001) reduction in monthly new prescriptions of brand-name statin over the study period, with little change in generic prescribing. The reduction in branded prescriptions was concentrated among physicians with the highest tercile of drug spending pre-PPSA, with a decrease of 15% (p < 0.001) in new branded statin prescriptions. The decline was most prominent after mandated reporting of industry payments began before the payment data was published. Conclusions The PPSA may have achieved its intended effect of reducing branded prescriptions at least in the short run, particularly among physicians most likely to have engaged in excessive or low-value prescribing of branded drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1153
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ASPE, 2016, OBSERVATIONS TRENDS
[2]   DETERMINANTS OF PHYSICIAN AND PHARMACIST SUPPORT OF GENERIC DRUGS [J].
BEARDEN, WO ;
MASON, JB .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1980, 7 (02) :121-130
[3]  
Becker A.L., 2013, CONNECTICUT IS ONLY
[4]   A national survey of physician-industry relationships [J].
Campbell, Eric G. ;
Gruen, Russell L. ;
Mountford, James ;
Miller, Lawrence G. ;
Cleary, Paul D. ;
Blumenthal, David .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (17) :1742-1750
[5]   Physician Professionalism and Changes in Physician-Industry Relationships From 2004 to 2009 [J].
Campbell, Eric G. ;
Rao, Sowmya R. ;
DesRoches, Catherine M. ;
Iezzoni, Lisa I. ;
Vogeli, Christine ;
Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana ;
Miralles, Paola D. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 170 (20) :1820-1826
[6]   Drug firms' payments and physicians' prescribing behavior in Medicare Part D [J].
Carey, Colleen ;
Lieber, Ethan M. J. ;
Miller, Sarah .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2021, 197
[7]  
Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, 2011, FED REGISTER, V76, P82129
[8]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) HHS, 2013, Fed Regist, V78, P9457
[9]   Regulating Conflicts of Interest in Medicine Through Public Disclosure: Evidence from a Physician Payments Sunshine Law [J].
Chao, Matthew ;
Larkin, Ian .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (02) :1078-1094
[10]   Mandatory Disclosure: Theory and Evidence from Industry-Physician Relationships [J].
Chen, Daniel L. ;
Levonyan, Vardges ;
Reinhart, S. Eric ;
Taksler, Glen .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2019, 48 (02) :409-440