Analyzing Medical Research Results Based on Synthetic Data and Their Relation to Real Data Results: Systematic Comparison From Five Observational Studies

被引:88
作者
Benaim, Anat Reiner [1 ]
Almog, Ronit [1 ,2 ]
Gorelik, Yuri [3 ]
Hochberg, Irit [4 ,5 ]
Nassar, Laila [6 ]
Mashiach, Tanya [1 ]
Khamaisi, Mogher [3 ,4 ,7 ]
Lurie, Yael [5 ,6 ]
Azzam, Zaher S. [5 ,8 ,9 ]
Khoury, Johad [8 ]
Kurnik, Daniel [5 ,10 ]
Beyar, Rafael [5 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Clin Epidemiol Unit, POB 9602, IL-3109601 Haifa, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Sch Publ Hlth, Haifa, Israel
[3] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Dept Internal Med D, Haifa, Israel
[4] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Inst Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Haifa, Israel
[5] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
[6] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Clin Pharmacol & Toxicol Sect, Haifa, Israel
[7] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Diabet Stem Cell Lab, Haifa, Israel
[8] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Dept Internal Med B, Haifa, Israel
[9] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Rappaport Res Inst, Haifa, Israel
[10] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Clin Pharmacol Unit, Haifa, Israel
[11] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
关键词
synthetic data; electronic medical records; MDClone; validation study; big data analysis; HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; INSULIN DETEMIR; RISK-FACTORS; NEPHROPATHY; ADMISSIONS; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; FAILURE; TIME;
D O I
10.2196/16492
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Privacy restrictions limit access to protected patient-derived health information for research purposes. Consequently, data anonymization is required to allow researchers data access for initial analysis before granting institutional review board approval. A system installed and activated at our institution enables synthetic data generation that mimics data from real electronic medical records, wherein only fictitious patients are listed. Objective: This paper aimed to validate the results obtained when analyzing synthetic structured data for medical research. A comprehensive validation process concerning meaningful clinical questions and various types of data was conducted to assess the accuracy and precision of statistical estimates derived from synthetic patient data. Methods: A cross-hospital project was conducted to validate results obtained from synthetic data produced for five contemporary studies on various topics. For each study, results derived from synthetic data were compared with those based on real data. In addition, repeatedly generated synthetic datasets were used to estimate the bias and stability of results obtained from synthetic data. Results: This study demonstrated that results derived from synthetic data were predictive of results from real data. When the number of patients was large relative to the number of variables used, highly accurate and strongly consistent results were observed between synthetic and real data. For studies based on smaller populations that accounted for confounders and modifiers by multivariate models, predictions were of moderate accuracy, yet clear trends were correctly observed. Conclusions: The use of synthetic structured data provides a close estimate to real data results and is thus a powerful tool in shaping research hypotheses and accessing estimated analyses, without risking patient privacy. Synthetic data enable broad access to data (eg, for out-of-organization researchers), and rapid, safe, and repeatable analysis of data in hospitals or other health organizations where patient privacy is a primary value.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Acute Myocardial Infarction [J].
Anderson, Jeffrey L. ;
Morrow, David A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (21) :2053-2064
[2]   Under threat: patient confidentiality and NHS computing [J].
Anderson, Ross .
DRUGS AND ALCOHOL TODAY, 2006, 6 (04) :13-17
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, REALISM SYNTHETIC DA
[4]   ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 Expert Consensus Document on Reducing the Gastrointestinal Risks of Antiplatelet Therapy and NSAID Use A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents [J].
Bhatt, Deepak L. ;
Scheiman, James ;
Abraham, Neena S. ;
Antman, Elliott M. ;
Chan, Francis K. L. ;
Furberg, Curt D. ;
Johnson, David A. ;
Mahaffey, Kenneth W. ;
Quigley, Eamonn M. .
CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (18) :1894-1909
[5]   Data-driven approach for creating synthetic electronic medical records [J].
Buczak, Anna L. ;
Babin, Steven ;
Moniz, Linda .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2010, 10
[6]   The validity of synthetic clinical data: a validation study of a leading synthetic data generator (Synthea) using clinical quality measures [J].
Chen, Junqiao ;
Chun, David ;
Patel, Milesh ;
Chiang, Epson ;
James, Jesse .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 19 (1)
[7]  
Choi E, 2017, INMACHINE LEARNING H
[8]   A Systematic Review of Re-Identification Attacks on Health Data [J].
El Emam, Khaled ;
Jonker, Elizabeth ;
Arbuckle, Luk ;
Malin, Bradley .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (12)
[9]  
Garfinkle Simson, 2015, De-identification of Personal Information
[10]   Insulin detemir - A new basal insulin analog [J].
Goldman-Levine, JD ;
Lee, KW .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2005, 39 (03) :502-507