Effects of high-frequency stimulation of the nucleus accumbens on the development and expression of ethanol sensitization in mice

被引:9
作者
Nona, Christina N. [1 ,4 ]
Creed, Meaghan C. [1 ,4 ]
Hamani, Clement [4 ,5 ]
Nobrega, Jose N. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[4] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Campbell Family Mental Hlth Res Inst, Behav Neurobiol Lab, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Div Neurosurg, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY | 2015年 / 26卷 / 1-2期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
alcohol; behavioural sensitization; DBA/2; mouse; deep brain stimulation; locomotor activity; nucleus accumbens; DEEP BRAIN-STIMULATION; LONG-TERM POTENTIATION; BEHAVIORAL SENSITIZATION; SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; IN-VIVO; AMPHETAMINE SENSITIZATION; LOCOMOTOR SENSITIZATION; DBA/2J MICE; MOUSE-BRAIN;
D O I
10.1097/FBP.0000000000000033
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The behavioural effects of high-frequency electrical stimulation (HFS) are often similar to the effects of lesions, with the advantage of being reversible. The present study examined the effects of HFS of the nucleus accumbens (NAc), an area that has been shown to be important for sensitization to several psychostimulants, on the development and expression of EtOH sensitization. Male DBA/2 mice received five biweekly injections of EtOH (2.2 g/kg, intraperitoneally) or saline (SAL) immediately before assessments of locomotor activity (LMA). For some of the mice, each EtOH or SAL injection was preceded by 2 h of bilateral NAc HFS, whereas the remaining mice received no stimulation. Seven days after the last injection, LMA was again measured after the mice received a challenge dose of EtOH (1.8 g/kg, intraperitoneally) or SAL, either preceded or not preceded by 2 h of HFS. Mice receiving NAc HFS before EtOH injections during the sensitization period showed progressive increases in LMA that were not different from the LMA scores of EtOH-injected mice which had received no HFS. However, when the latter group was subsequently challenged after receiving HFS, a strong suppression of LMA was observed, in comparison with their own previous LMA scores (-72%) and compared with EtOH-sensitized groups challenged in the absence of HFS (-70%). A separate cohort of mice that were surgically implanted but not stimulated showed a robust EtOH sensitization response that did not differ from that of EtOH-treated mice without electrodes, demonstrating that HFS behavioural effects were not merely a result of the presence of electrodes in the NAc. These results suggest that NAc HFS may have different effects at different stages of the EtOH sensitization process, specifically suppressing expression, but not the development of EtOH sensitization. This pattern of distinct effects of NAc manipulations on different aspects of sensitization is similar to what has been reported for other drugs of abuse, suggesting a commonality of mechanisms. Our findings also suggest that the sensitization may provide a useful paradigm for the investigation of mechanisms of clinical effectiveness of HFS in humans. Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 192
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]   Behavioral sensitization to ethanol: Genetics and the effects of stress [J].
Phillips, TJ ;
Roberts, AJ ;
Lessov, CN .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1997, 57 (03) :487-493
[32]   BEHAVIORAL SENSITIZATION TO DRUG STIMULANT EFFECTS IN C57BL/6J AND DBA/2J INBRED MICE [J].
PHILLIPS, TJ ;
DICKINSON, S ;
BURKHARTKASCH, S .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1994, 108 (04) :789-803
[33]   A circuitry model of the expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-like psychostimulants [J].
Pierce, RC ;
Kalivas, PW .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1997, 25 (02) :192-216
[34]   Electrical Stimulation of the Insular Region Attenuates Nicotine-Taking and Nicotine-Seeking Behaviors [J].
Pushparaj, Abhiram ;
Hamani, Clement ;
Yu, Wilson ;
Shin, Damian S. ;
Kang, Bin ;
Nobrega, Jose N. ;
Le Foll, Bernard .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 38 (04) :690-698
[35]   Differential propensity to ethanol sensitization is not associated with altered binding to D1 receptors or dopamine transporters in mouse brain [J].
Quadros, IMH ;
Nobrega, JN ;
Hipólide, DC ;
De Lucca, EM ;
Souza-Formigoni, MLO .
ADDICTION BIOLOGY, 2002, 7 (03) :291-299
[36]   Resistance to ethanol sensitization is associated with increased NMDA receptor binding in specific brain areas [J].
Quadros, IMH ;
Hipólide, DC ;
Frussa, R ;
De Lucca, EM ;
Nobrega, JN ;
Souza-Formigoni, MLO .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 442 (1-2) :55-61
[37]  
Robinson TE, 2000, ADDICTION, V95, pS91
[38]   THE NEURAL BASIS OF DRUG CRAVING - AN INCENTIVE-SENSITIZATION THEORY OF ADDICTION [J].
ROBINSON, TE ;
BERRIDGE, KC .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1993, 18 (03) :247-291
[39]   Drug Wanting: Behavioral Sensitization and Relapse to Drug-Seeking Behavior [J].
Steketee, Jeffery D. ;
Kalivas, Peter W. .
PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2011, 63 (02) :348-365
[40]  
STEWART J, 1993, BEHAV PHARMACOL, V4, P289