Corporate governance and carbon emissions performance: empirical evidence from Australia

被引:63
作者
Elsayih, Jibriel [1 ]
Datt, Rina [1 ]
Tang, Qingliang [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Climate change; corporate governance; carbon performance; carbon accounting; ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURES; BOARD CHARACTERISTICS; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; GENDER DIVERSITY; LEGITIMACY; MANAGEMENT; TRANSPARENCY; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1080/14486563.2021.1989066
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is a growing volume of literature on corporate governance and sustainability. Despite this, the relationship between corporate governance (CG) and carbon emissions performance (CEP) is an unresolved issue. This motivates us to examine the impact of CG on CEP, using a sample of all Australian firms that have participated in the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) questionnaire survey. This study employs fixed-effects modelling for an unbalanced panel of 425 firm-year observations from 2010-2018. We find that firms with higher board independence and the presence of an environmental committee show enhanced CEP. Further, frequency of board meetings and gender diversity lead to improved CEP. However, ownership concentration does not appear to improve CEP. Our article provides valuable insight for corporate directors and regulators to help them recognize the vital role that board meetings, board gender diversity, board independence, and the presence of an environmental committee play in driving the carbon performance of companies. They can also use these results to identify positive elements of CG that may deserve additional regulatory focus to achieve carbon policy objectives. This study contributes to the increasing literature on the association between CG and climate change and presents a new direction for related research on whether and how CEP is influenced by CG.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 459
页数:27
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence [J].
Adams, M ;
Hardwick, P .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1998, 35 (05) :641-654
[2]   LARGE SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM, RISK SHARING, AND FINANCIAL MARKET EQUILIBRIUM [J].
ADMATI, AR ;
PFLEIDERER, P ;
ZECHNER, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1994, 102 (06) :1097-1130
[3]   Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Mansi, SA ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2004, 37 (03) :315-342
[4]  
Ansoff H.I., 1965, CORPORATE STRATEGY
[5]  
Baltagi B., 2008, ECONOMETRIC ANAL PAN, V1
[6]   Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project [J].
Ben-Amar, Walid ;
Chang, Millicent ;
McIlkenny, Philip .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 142 (02) :369-383
[7]   ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: AN INTEGRATED AGENCY-INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 52 (01) :103-126
[8]   Board composition, sustainability committee and corporate social and environmental performance in Australia [J].
Biswas, Pallab Kumar ;
Mansi, Mansi ;
Pandey, Rakesh .
PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2018, 30 (04) :517-540
[9]   Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value [J].
Brick, Ivan E. ;
Chidambaran, N. K. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2010, 16 (04) :533-553
[10]   Corporate philanthropic practices [J].
Brown, William O. ;
Helland, Eric ;
Smith, Janet Kiholm .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2006, 12 (05) :855-877