Psychological and Behavioral Responses to Interval and Continuous Exercise

被引:63
作者
Stork, Matthew J. [1 ]
Gibala, Martin J. [2 ]
Ginis, Kathleen A. Martin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Hlth & Exercise Sci, 3333 Univ Way, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Kinesiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med, Fac Med, Kelowna, BC, Canada
关键词
INTERVAL TRAINING; INACTIVE ADULTS; AFFECTIVE RESPONSES; ENJOYMENT; EXERCISE PREFERENCES; EXERCISE BEHAVIOR; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; ENJOYMENT RESPONSES; HEALTH; METAANALYSIS; DISPLEASURE; PLEASURE; OBESE; MUSIC;
D O I
10.1249/MSS.0000000000001671
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare psychological responses to, and preferences for, moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity interval training (HIIT), and sprint interval training (SIT) among inactive adults; and to investigate the relationships between affect, enjoyment, exercise preferences, and subsequent exercise behavior over a 4-wk follow-up period. Methods Thirty inactive men and women (21.23 3.81 yr), inexperienced with HIIT or SIT, completed three trials of cycle ergometer exercise in random order on separate days: MICT (45 min continuous; approximately 70% to 75% of HR maximum (HRmax)); HIIT (10 x 1 min bouts at approximately 85% to 90% HRmax with 1-min recovery periods); and SIT (3 x 20-s all-out sprints with 2-min recovery periods). Perceived exertion (RPE), affect, and arousal were measured throughout the trials and enjoyment was measured postexercise. Participants rank-ordered the protocols (1-3) according to preference and logged their exercise over a 4-wk follow-up. Results Despite elevated HR, RPE, and arousal during work periods (P's < 0.05), and negative affect during HIIT and SIT, enjoyment and preferences for MICT, HIIT, and SIT were similar (P's > 0.05). In-task affect was predictive of postexercise enjoyment for each type of exercise (r's = 0.32 to 0.47; P's < 0.05). In-task affect and postexercise enjoyment predicted preferences for HIIT and SIT (r(s)'s = -0.34 to -0.61; P's < 0.05), but not for MICT (P's > 0.05), respectively. Over the follow-up, participants completed more MICT (M = 6.11 +/- 4.12) than SIT sessions (M = 1.39 +/- 1.85; P < 0.01, d = 1.34). Although participants tended to complete more sessions of MICT than HIIT (M = 3.54 +/- 4.23; P = 0.16, d = 0.56), and more sessions of HIIT than SIT (P = 0.07, d = 0.60), differences were not significant. In-task affect predicted the number of sessions of MICT (r = 0.40; P < 0.05), but not HIIT or SIT (P's > 0.05). Conclusions This study provides new evidence that a single session of HIIT and SIT can be as enjoyable and preferable as MICT among inactive individuals and that there may be differences in the exercise affect-behavior relationship between interval and continuous exercise.
引用
收藏
页码:2110 / 2121
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, BORGS PERCEIVED EXER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The measurement of affect, mood, and emotion: a guide for health-behavioral research
[4]   High-intensity interval running is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise: Implications for exercise adherence [J].
Bartlett, Jonathan D. ;
Close, Graeme L. ;
MacLaren, Don P. M. ;
Gregson, Warren ;
Drust, Barry ;
Morton, James P. .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2011, 29 (06) :547-553
[5]   Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies [J].
Batacan, Romeo B., Jr. ;
Duncan, Mitch J. ;
Dalbo, Vincent J. ;
Tucker, Patrick S. ;
Fenning, Andrew S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 51 (06) :494-503
[6]   High-intensity interval exercise training for public health: a big HIT or shall we HIT it on the head? [J].
Biddle, Stuart J. H. ;
Batterham, Alan M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2015, 12
[7]  
Blair SN, 2009, BRIT J SPORT MED, V43, P1
[8]   Inter-Individual Variability in the Adaptive Responses to Endurance and Sprint Interval Training: A Randomized Crossover Study [J].
Bonafiglia, Jacob T. ;
Rotundo, Mario P. ;
Whittall, Jonathan P. ;
Scribbans, Trisha D. ;
Graham, Ryan B. ;
Gurd, Brendon J. .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12)
[9]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[10]  
Colley Rachel C, 2011, Health Rep, V22, P7