The "Nobel Population" in Pharmacology: Nobel Prize laureates, nominees and nominators 1901-1953 with a focus on B. Naunyn and O. Schmiedeberg

被引:12
作者
Pohar, Michael [1 ]
Hansson, Nils [1 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Duesseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Hist Philosophy & Eth Med, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Pharmacology; Nobel Prize; Excellence in Pharmacology; Bernhard Naunyn; Oswald Schmiedeberg;
D O I
10.1007/s00210-019-01807-y
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
One way to investigate research trends in pharmacology over time is to study nominations for the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine. Going beyond the laureates with strong links to pharmacology, this article pinpoints pharmacologist Nobel Prize nominees during the first half of the twentieth century with a particular focus on two co-founders of this journal: Oswald Schmiedeberg and Bernhard Naunyn. Using the Nobel nomination database which contains more than 5000 nominations in the category physiology or medicine from 1901 to 1953, we listed all scholars (Nobel nominees or nominators) who worked in a pharmacological institute. In addition, we collected nomination letters of Schmiedeberg and Naunyn in the archive of the Nobel committee for physiology or medicine in Stockholm to explore nomination networks and motives. The most often nominated pharmacologists from 1901 to 1953 were Alfred Newton Richards with 57 nominations, Rudolf Magnus (31), Edward Calvin Kendall (28), Otto Loewi (27), Sir Henry Hallett Dale (21) and Oswald Schmiedeberg (18). Surprisingly, the lion's share of the nominations was submitted by non-pharmacologists. We observed a decline in German nominations after World War II and an increase in US-American nominations, which indicates shifting centres and peripheries in pharmacological research. Furthermore, in our observed group of pharmacologists, there was no female nominee from 1901 to 1953. Nobel Prize nominations are to date an underused source to explore international scientific trends as well as scientific networks during the twentieth century.
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1185
页数:13
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GESCH PHARMAKOLOGISC
[2]  
Crawford E.T., 1984, The Beginnings of the Nobel Institution: The Science Prizes, 1901-1915
[3]   Effects of homophily and academic reputation in the nomination and selection of Nobel laureates [J].
Gallotti, Riccardo ;
De Domenico, Manlio .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
[4]  
Hansson N, 2019, CLIO MED, V98, P122, DOI 10.1163/9789004406421_008
[5]   Female physicians nominated for the Nobel Prize 1901-50 [J].
Hansson, Nils ;
Fangerau, Heiner .
LANCET, 2018, 391 (10126) :1157-1158
[6]   Nobel Prize nominees hundred years ago: Abraham Jacobi (1830-1919) and Otto Heubner (1843-1926) [J].
Hansson, Nils ;
Oommen-Halbach, Anne ;
Borkhardt, Arndt ;
Fangerau, Heiner .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2017, 176 (10) :1411-1413
[7]   Nobel Prize nominees and the rise of urology in Europe around 1900 [J].
Hansson, Nils ;
Krischel, Matthis ;
Halling, Thorsten ;
Moll, Friedrich ;
Fangerau, Heiner .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (08) :1291-1295
[8]   Why Did Alfred Blalock and Helen Taussig Not Receive the Nobel Prize? [J].
Hansson, Nils ;
Schlich, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2015, 30 (06) :506-509
[9]   A "Life Dedicated to True Science": Eduard Pfluger and the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine [J].
Hansson, Nils ;
Schlich, Thomas .
PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 466 (11) :2021-2024
[10]  
Liljestrand G, 1962, NOBEL MAN HIS PRIZES