First Clinical Evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope During Routine and Difficult Intubation

被引:91
|
作者
Cavus, Erol [1 ]
Neumann, Tobias [1 ]
Doerges, Volker [1 ]
Moeller, Thora [2 ]
Scharf, Edwin [1 ]
Wagner, Klaus [2 ]
Bein, Berthold [1 ]
Serocki, Goetz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[2] Klinikum Suedstadt Rostock, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Rostock, Germany
关键词
TRACHEAL INTUBATION; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; EMERGENCY;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820553fb
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In the present preliminary study we evaluated the C-MAC (R) D-Blade (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany), a new videolaryngoscopic C-MAC blade for difficult intubation, during both routine and difficult intubations. First, both the conventional direct laryngoscopy and the D-Blade were used in 15 consecutive patients with normal airways during routine induction of anesthesia. Second, the D-Blade was used as a rescue device in 20 of 300 (6.7%) consecutive patients, when conventional direct laryngoscopy failed. In the 15 patients during routine induction of anesthesia, with direct laryngoscopy, a Cormack-Lehane (C/L) grade 1 and grade 2a view was seen in 7 and 8 patients, respectively. It was possible to insert the D-Blade and to get a video view of the glottis on the first attempt in all patients; with the D-Blade, all 15 patients had a C/L 1 view. The time to successful intubation with the D-Blade was 15 (8-26) seconds (median (range)). In the 20 patients, in whom unexpected difficulty with direct laryngoscopy was observed, C/L grades 3 and 4 were present in 15 and 5 patients, respectively. With the use of the D-Blade, indirect C/L video view improved to C/L class 1 in 15 patients, and to 2a in 5 patients, respectively. The time from touching the laryngoscope to optimal laryngoscopic view was 11(5-45) seconds and for successful intubation 17(3-80) seconds. In all 35 patients, with the D-Blade no direct view of the glottis was possible and subsequently a semiflexible tube guide was required. (Anesth Analg 2011;112:382-5)
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 385
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rational Design of End-Points to Evaluate Performance of the C-MAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope During Routine and Difficult Intubation Response
    Cavus, Erol
    Doerges, Volker
    Wagner, Klaus
    Serocki, Goetz
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 113 (01) : 203 - 204
  • [2] Comparison between bougies and stylets for simulated tracheal intubation with the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope
    Batuwitage, Bisanth
    McDonald, Andrew
    Nishikawa, Koji
    Lythgoe, Daniel
    Mercer, Simon
    Charters, Peter
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 32 (06) : 400 - 405
  • [3] Comparison of Different Types of Stylets with No-Stylet Technique for Intubation with C-MAC D-Blade® Videolaryngoscope in Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study
    Goel, Rishika
    Anand, Lakesh Kumar
    Singh, Manpreet
    Jindal, Swati
    Rani, Mala
    Kaur, Arshdeep
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2021, 49 (06) : 445 - 452
  • [4] Comparison of cervical spine motion during intubation with a C-MAC D-Blade® and an LMA Fastrach®
    Ozkan, D.
    Altinsoy, S.
    Sayin, M.
    Dolgun, H.
    Ergil, J.
    Donmez, A.
    ANAESTHESIST, 2019, 68 (02): : 90 - 96
  • [5] GlideScope versus C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: A multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial
    Huang, Ping
    Qiu, Yuwei
    Xu, Ting
    Sun, Xiaoqiong
    Lu, Zhixing
    Zhang, Yunyun
    Yu, Jiangli
    Wu, Jingxiang
    Su, Diansan
    Huang, Zhenling
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2023, 91
  • [6] Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study
    Seo, Kwon Hui
    Kim, Kyung Mi
    John, Hyunji
    Jun, Joo Hyun
    Han, Minsoo
    Kim, Soyoun
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [7] Comparison of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope and direct laryngoscope in pediatric patients: Randomized controlled trial
    Hajiyeva, Konul
    Can, Ozlem Selvi
    Baytas, Volkan
    Guclu, Cigdem Yildirim
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2021, 27 (04): : 421 - 426
  • [8] Awake videolaryngoscopic orotracheal intubation in patients with laryngeal tumour using the C-MAC D-Blade
    Selvam, Selwin R.
    Jindal, Swati
    Anand, Lakesh K.
    Dawar, Manpreet Singh
    Dass, Arjun
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 66 (08) : 579 - 584
  • [9] Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways
    Serocki, G.
    Neumann, T.
    Scharf, E.
    Doerges, V.
    Cavus, E.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2013, 79 (02) : 121 - 129
  • [10] C-MAC D-Blade vs Airtraq for Intubation with Manual Inline Axial Stabilisation- A Randomised Clinical Trial
    Mani, Nikitha
    Palanisamy, Nagalakshmi
    Zachariah, Mamie
    George, Sagiev Koshy
    Dsilva, Allen Aloysius
    Johns, Jemmie Rachel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (01)