Multiparametric Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Acute Myocarditis: Comparison of 2009 and 2018 Lake Louise Criteria With Endomyocardial Biopsy Confirmation

被引:19
|
作者
Li, Shuang [1 ]
Duan, Xuejing [2 ]
Feng, Guangxun [3 ]
Sirajuddin, Arlene [4 ]
Yin, Gang [1 ,5 ]
Zhuang, Baiyan [1 ]
He, Jian [1 ]
Xu, Jing [1 ]
Yang, Wenjing [1 ]
Wu, Weichun [5 ,6 ]
Sun, Xiaoxin [5 ,7 ]
Zhao, Shihua [1 ]
Wang, Hongyue [3 ]
Teng, Zhongzhao [8 ]
Lu, Minjie [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Magnet Resonance Imaging, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis,Fuwai Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Fuwai Hosp, Dept Pathol, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Fuwai Hosp, Dept Cardiol, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] NHLBI, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, NIH, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Key Lab Cardiovasc Imaging Cultivat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Fuwai Hosp, Dept Echocardiog, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Fuwai Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[8] Univ Cambridge, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
myocarditis; cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR); diagnostic performance; Lake Louise criteria; endomyocardial biopsy; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; INCREMENTAL VALUE; CMR; ASSOCIATION; STATEMENT; SOCIETY; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2021.739892
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been shown to improve the diagnosis of myocarditis, but no systematic comparison of this technique is currently available. The purpose of this study was to compare the 2009 and 2018 Lake Louise Criteria (LLC) for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis using 3.0 T MRI with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) as a reference and to provide the cutoff values for multiparametric CMR techniques. Methods: A total of 73 patients (32 +/- 14 years, 71.2% men) with clinically suspected myocarditis undergoing EMB and CMR with 3.0 T were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to EMB results (EMB-positive and -negative groups). The CMR protocol consisted of cine-SSFP, T2 STIR, T2 mapping, early and late gadolinium enhancement (EGE, LGE), and pre- and post-contrast T1 mapping. Their potential diagnostic ability was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: The myocardial T1 and T2 relaxation times were significantly higher in the EMB-positive group than in the EMB-negative group. Optimal cutoff values were 1,228 ms for T1 relaxation times and 58.5 ms for T2 relaxation times with sensitivities of 86.0 and 83.7% and specificities of 93.3 and 93.3%, respectively. The 2018 LLC had a better diagnostic performance than the 2009 LLC in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. T1 mapping + T2 mapping had the largest area under the curve (0.95) compared to other single or combined parameters (2018 LLC: 0.91; 2009 LLC: 0.76; T2 ratio: 0.71; EGEr: 0.67; LGE: 0.73; ). The diagnostic accuracy for the 2018 LLC was the highest (91.8%), followed by T1 mapping (89.0%) and T2 mapping (87.7%). Conclusion: Emerging technologies such as T1/ T2 mapping have significantly improved the diagnostic performance of CMR for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis. The 2018 LLC provided the overall best diagnostic performance in acute myocarditis compared to other single standard CMR parameters or combined parameters. There was no significant gain when 2018LLC is combined with the EGE sequence.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Diagnostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in comparison to endomyocardial biopsy in cardiac amyloidosis: a multi-centre study
    Grigorios Chatzantonis
    Michael Bietenbeck
    Ahmed Elsanhoury
    Carsten Tschöpe
    Burkert Pieske
    Gloria Tauscher
    Julia Vietheer
    Zornitsa Shomanova
    Heiko Mahrholdt
    Andreas Rolf
    Sebastian Kelle
    Ali Yilmaz
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2021, 110 : 555 - 568
  • [22] Diagnostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in comparison to endomyocardial biopsy in cardiac amyloidosis: a multi-centre study
    Chatzantonis, Grigorios
    Bietenbeck, Michael
    Elsanhoury, Ahmed
    Tschope, Carsten
    Pieske, Burkert
    Tauscher, Gloria
    Vietheer, Julia
    Shomanova, Zornitsa
    Mahrholdt, Heiko
    Rolf, Andreas
    Kelle, Sebastian
    Yilmaz, Ali
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 110 (04) : 555 - 568
  • [23] Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected acute myocarditis -: Comparison of different approaches
    Abdel-Aty, H
    Boyé, P
    Zagrosek, A
    Wassmuth, R
    Kumar, A
    Messroghli, D
    Bock, P
    Dietz, R
    Friedrich, MG
    Schulz-Menger, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (11) : 1815 - 1822
  • [24] Utility of cardiac FDG-PET imaging coupled to magnetic resonance for the management of an acute myocarditis with non-informative endomyocardial biopsy
    Piriou, Nicolas
    Sassier, Jerome
    Pallardy, Amandine
    Serfaty, Jean-Michel
    Trochu, Jean-Noel
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2015, 16 (05) : 574 - 574
  • [25] Myocarditis as a precipitating factor for heart failure: evaluation and 1-year follow-up using cardiovascular magnetic resonance and endomyocardial biopsy
    Mavrogeni, Sophie
    Spargias, Costas
    Bratis, Costas
    Kolovou, Genovefa
    Markussis, Vyron
    Papadopoulou, Evangelia
    Constadoulakis, Pantelis
    Papadimitropoulos, Miltiadis
    Douskou, Marouso
    Pavlides, Gregory
    Cokkinos, Denis
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2011, 13 (08) : 830 - 837
  • [26] Head-to-head comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and endomyocardial biopsy for evaluating underlying etiology in patients with heart failure
    Yoshida, A.
    Ishibashi-Ueda, H.
    Yamada, N.
    Asakura, M.
    Kitakaze, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 : 1100 - 1101
  • [27] Post-COVID myocarditis diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy and/or magnetic resonance imaging 2-9 months after acute COVID-19
    Blagova, O.
    Ainetdinova, D. H.
    Lutokhina, Y. U. A.
    Novosadov, V. M.
    Rud', R. S.
    Zaitsev, A. Y. U.
    Kukleva, A. D.
    Alexandrova, S. A.
    Kogan, E. A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 1751 - 1751
  • [28] Diagnostic Performance of Extracellular Volume, Native T1, and T2 Mapping Versus Lake Louise Criteria by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Detection of Acute Myocarditis: A Meta-Analysis
    Pan, Jonathan A.
    Lee, Yoo Jin
    Salerno, Michael
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2018, 11 (07)
  • [29] Assessment of sub-clinical acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation: comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and endomyocardial biopsy
    Krieghoff, Christian
    Barten, Markus J.
    Hildebrand, Lysann
    Grothoff, Matthias
    Lehmkuhl, Lukas
    Luecke, Christian
    Andres, Claudia
    Nitzsche, Stefan
    Riese, Franziska
    Strueber, Martin
    Mohr, Friedrich Wilhelm
    Gutberlet, Matthias
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) : 2360 - 2371
  • [30] Assessment of sub-clinical acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation: Comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and endomyocardial biopsy
    Matthias Gutberlet
    Christian Krieghoff
    Markus J Barten
    Lysann Hildebrand
    Matthias Grothoff
    Lukas Lehmkuhl
    Christian Luecke
    Claudia Andres
    Friedrich W Mohr
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 16 (Suppl 1)