The value of statistical life in the context of road safety: new evidence on the contingent valuation/standard gamble chained approach

被引:5
作者
Sanchez-Martinez, Fernando-Ignacio [1 ]
Martinez-Perez, Jorge-Eduardo [1 ]
Abellan-Perpinan, Jose-Maria [1 ]
Pinto-Prades, Jose-Luis [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Appl Econ Dept, Fac Econ & Business, Murcia 30100, Spain
[2] Univ Navarra, Dept Econ, Sch Business & Econ, Pamplona 31009, Spain
关键词
Value of statistical life; Contingent valuation; Standard gamble; Ratio bias effect; REPLICATION; VALIDITY; REDUCTION; ECONOMICS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s11166-021-09360-x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study estimates the value of statistical life (VSL) on a road traffic accident using the Contingent Valuation/Standard Gamble chained approach. A large representative sample (n = 2020) is used to calculate a VSL for use in the evaluation of road safety programmes in Spain. The paper also makes some methodological contributions, by providing new evidence about the consistency of the chained method. Our main results are: (1) A range from 1.3 million euro to 1.7 million euro is obtained for the VSL in Spain in the context of road accidents. This range is in line with the values used in the same context in other European countries, although it is lower than those obtained in different contexts and with other methods. (2) The method performs much better in terms of scope sensitivity than the traditional contingent valuation method, which asks subjects about their willingness to pay for very small reductions in the risk of death. (3) We introduce a new 'indirect' chaining approach which reduces (but does not remove) the disparity between direct and indirect chaining approaches. More extreme VSL estimates are still obtained with this indirect method than with the direct one. (4) VSL estimates depend on the injury used. More specifically, we obtained a lower VSL when a more severe injury is used. (5) Framing the risk of death in the modified standard gamble question as "10n in 10,000" instead of "n in 1000" influences the value of VSL. We attribute this effect to the Ratio Bias.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 228
页数:26
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] LOWERING THE FLOOR' OF THE SF-6D SCORING ALGORITHM USING A LOTTERY EQUIVALENT METHOD
    Abellan Perpinan, Jose Maria
    Sanchez Martinez, Fernando Ignacio
    Martinez Perez, Jorge Eduardo
    Mendez, Ildefonso
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 21 (11) : 1271 - 1285
  • [2] Replication, Meta-Analysis, and Research Synthesis in Economics
    Anderson, Richard G.
    Kichkha, Areerat
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (05) : 56 - 59
  • [3] Valuation of small and multiple health risks: A critical analysis of SP data applied to food and water safety
    Andersson, Henrik
    Hole, Arne Risa
    Svensson, Mikael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 75 : 41 - 53
  • [4] The value of statistical life for adults and children: Comparisons of the contingent valuation and chained approaches
    Balmford, Ben
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Bolt, Katherine
    Day, Brett
    Ferrini, Silvia
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 57 : 68 - 84
  • [5] On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part I - Caveat investigator
    Beattie, J
    Covey, J
    Dolan, P
    Hopkins, L
    Jones-Lee, M
    Loomes, G
    Pidgeon, N
    Robinson, A
    Spencer, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1998, 17 (01) : 5 - 25
  • [6] Replication in Microeconomics Assessing the Rate of Replication in Economics
    Berry, James
    Coffman, Lucas C.
    Hanley, Douglas
    Gihleb, Rania
    Wilson, Alistair J.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (05) : 27 - 31
  • [7] On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part 2 - The CV/SG "chained" approach
    Carthy, T
    Chilton, S
    Covey, D
    Hopkins, L
    Jones-Lee, M
    Loomes, G
    Pidgeon, N
    Spencer, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1998, 17 (03) : 187 - 213
  • [8] Response to 'Testing the validity of the "value of a prevented fatality" (VPF) used to assess UK safety measures'
    Chilton, S.
    Covey, J.
    Jones-Lee, M.
    Loomes, G.
    Pidgeon, N.
    Spencer, A.
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2015, 93 : 293 - 298
  • [9] Valuing mortality-risk reduction: Using visual aids to improve the validity of contingent valuation
    Corso, PS
    Hammitt, JK
    Graham, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2001, 23 (02) : 165 - 184
  • [10] DETR, 1998, HIGHW EC NOT NO 1