Amide proton transfer (APT) magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison with Gleason scores

被引:52
|
作者
Takayama, Yukihisa [1 ]
Nishie, Akihiro [2 ]
Sugimoto, Masaaki [3 ,4 ]
Togao, Osamu [2 ]
Asayama, Yoshiki [2 ]
Ishigami, Kousei [2 ]
Ushijima, Yasuhiro [2 ]
Okamoto, Daisuke [2 ]
Fujita, Nobuhiro [2 ]
Yokomizo, Akira [4 ]
Keupp, Jochen [5 ]
Honda, Hiroshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Radiol Informat & Network, Higashi Ku, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Clin Radiol, Higashi Ku, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[3] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Anat Pathol, Higashi Ku, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[4] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Urol, Higashi Ku, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[5] Philips Res, Roentgenstr 24-26, D-22335 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Amide proton transfer; Apparent diffusion coefficient values; Prostate cancer; Gleason score; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; 3; T; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGIC GRADE; AGGRESSIVENESS; VALUES; PARAMETERS; CARCINOMA; ADC;
D O I
10.1007/s10334-016-0537-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To evaluate the utility of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging in estimating the Gleason score (GS) of prostate cancer (Pca). Sixty-six biopsy-proven cancers were categorized into four groups according to the GS: GS-6 (3 + 3); GS-7 (3 + 4/4 + 3); GS-8 (4 + 4) and GS-9 (4 + 5/5 + 4). APT signal intensities (APT SIs) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of each GS group were compared by one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's HSD post hoc test. The mean and standard deviation of the APT SIs (%) and ADC values (x10(-3) mm(2)/s) were as follows: GS-6, 2.48 +/- 0.59 and 1.16 +/- 0.26; GS-7, 5.17 +/- 0.66 and 0.92 +/- 0.18; GS-8, 2.56 +/- 0.85 and 0.86 +/- 0.17; GS-9, 1.96 +/- 0.75 and 0.85 +/- 0.18, respectively. The APT SI of the GS-7 group was highest, and there were significant differences between the GS-6 and GS-7 groups and the GS-7 and GS-9 groups (p < 0.05). The ADC value of the GS-6 group was significantly higher than each value of the GS-7, GS-8, and GS-9 groups (p < 0.05), but no significant differences were obtained among the GS-7, GS-8, and GS-9 groups. The mean APT SI in Pca with a GS of 7 was higher than that for the other GS groups.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 679
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Association of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Parameters with Histopathologic Findings
    Abedi, Iraj
    Tavakkoli, Mohammad Bagher
    Rabbani, Masoud
    Jabbari, Keyvan
    Sirous, Mehri
    Far, Ghasem Yadegar
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (03)
  • [42] The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scores
    Huang, Tzu-Heng
    Li, Wei-Ming
    Ke, Hung-Lung
    Li, Ching-Chia
    Wu, Wen-Jeng
    Yeh, Hsin-Chih
    Wang, Yen-Chun
    Lee, Hsiang-Ying
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2025, 124 (02) : 145 - 150
  • [43] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: Current role in prostate cancer management
    Ueno, Yoshiko
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Bist, Vipul
    Reinhold, Caroline
    Miyake, Hideaki
    Tanaka, Utaru
    Kitajima, Kazuhiro
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    Takahashi, Satoru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (07) : 550 - 557
  • [44] Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: A review of current technology
    Dhiman, Ankita
    Kumar, Virendra
    Das, Chandan Jyoti
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 16 (10):
  • [45] Sensitivity and Source of Amine-Proton Exchange and Amide-Proton Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cerebral Ischemia
    Zong, Xiaopeng
    Wang, Ping
    Kim, Seong-Gi
    Jin, Tao
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2014, 71 (01) : 118 - 132
  • [46] Magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer
    Cornud, F.
    Villers, A.
    Mongiat-Artus, P.
    Rebillard, X.
    Soulie, M.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2008, 18 (10): : 621 - 633
  • [47] A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging techniques used to secure biopsies in prostate cancer patients
    van Luijtelaar, Annemarijke
    Bomers, Joyce
    Futterer, Jurgen
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2019, 19 (08) : 705 - 716
  • [48] The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Choi, Seungtaek
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04): : 1181 - 1182
  • [49] Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer clinical application
    Li, Bing
    Du, Yong
    Yang, Hanfeng
    Huang, Yayong
    Meng, Jun
    Xiao, Dongmei
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 25 (02) : 240 - 249
  • [50] Prostate Cancer: The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Dias, Joao Lopes
    Pina, Joao Magalhaes
    Joao, Raquel
    Fialho, Joana
    Carmo, Sandra
    Leal, Cecilia
    Bilhim, Tiago
    Marques, Rui Mateus
    Pinheiro, Luis Campos
    ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2015, 28 (02): : 240 - 249