Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy - a large, comprehensive, population-based study with long follow-up

被引:4
作者
Axen, Elin [1 ,2 ]
Stranne, Johan [1 ,2 ]
Mansson, Marianne [1 ]
Holmberg, Erik [3 ,4 ]
Godtman, Rebecka Arnsrud [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Reg Vastra Gotaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Oncol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Western Sweden Healthcare Reg, Reg Canc Ctr West, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Recurrence; prognosis; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; ANTIGEN RECURRENCE; NATURAL-HISTORY; CANCER; MEN; PROGRESSION; INTERVAL; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2022.2108140
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective We evaluated long-term risk for biochemical recurrence and subsequent prognosis in a population-based cohort. Material and Methods We used register-based data to evaluate 6 675 consecutive patients having radical prostatectomy in Vastra Gotaland county in Sweden during 1995-2014. Patients were followed until death or end of study, 31 December 2014. Data were collected from registers on national, regional and local level and linked by means of the Swedish personal identity number. Biochemical recurrence was defined as PSA >= 0.2 ng/ml; failure as hormonal treatment, metastasis or prostate cancer death. Survival analysis was used to estimate time to biochemical recurrence and time to failure after biochemical recurrence for patients with 0 - 2 years, 2-5 years, 5-10 years and >10 years interval to biochemical recurrence, respectively. Results A total of 1214 men had biochemical recurrence during follow-up. Biochemical recurrence-free survival was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82-84%), 75% (95% CI 74-77%) and 69% (95% CI 67-71%) at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Cumulative incidence of failure for all patients 15 years after biochemical recurrence was 50% (95% CI 43-55%) in competing risk analysis .The risk of failure after biochemical recurrence was highest among patients having biochemical recurrence within 2 years from surgery. Incomplete data on PSA-history is a limitation. Conclusions The risk for biochemical recurrence persists 15 years after surgery. Follow-up should continue as long as treatment would be considered in case of recurrent disease.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 292
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Racial Disparities in Oncologic Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy: Long-term Follow-up
    Faisal, Farzana A.
    Sundi, Debasish
    Cooper, John L.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth B.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Han, Misop
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    UROLOGY, 2014, 84 (06) : 1434 - 1441
  • [32] Survival after radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer: a population-based study
    Roder, Martin Andreas
    Brasso, Klaus
    Christensen, Ib Jarle
    Johansen, Jorgen
    Langkilde, Niels Christian
    Hvarness, Helle
    Carlsson, Steen
    Jakobsen, Henrik
    Borre, Michael
    Iversen, Peter
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 (04) : 541 - 547
  • [33] Controversial predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a study from a Latin American (Brazilian) Institution
    Noronha, Marcelo R.
    Quintal, Maisa M. Q.
    Magna, Luis A.
    Reis, Leonardo O.
    Billis, Athanase
    Meirelles, Luciana R.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2013, 39 (06): : 779 - 792
  • [34] Factors Associated with Remission of Eczema in Children: A Population-based Follow-up Study
    von Kobyletzki, Laura B.
    Bornehag, Carl-Gustaf
    Breeze, Elizabeth
    Larsson, Malin
    Lindstrom, Cecilia Boman
    Svensson, Ake
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2014, 94 (02) : 179 - 184
  • [35] Biopsy Based Proteomic Assay Predicts Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
    Saad, Fred
    Latour, Mathieu
    Lattouf, Jean-Baptiste
    Widmer, Hugues
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    Mes-Masson, Anne-Marie
    Ouellet, Veronique
    Saad, Genevieve
    Prakash, Amol
    Choudhury, Sibgat
    Han, Gang
    Karakiewicz, Pierre
    Richie, Jerome P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04) : 1034 - 1040
  • [36] External validation of two web-based postoperative nomograms predicting the probability of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study
    Yoneda, Kei
    Utsumi, Takanobu
    Somoto, Takatoshi
    Wakai, Ken
    Oka, Ryo
    Endo, Takumi
    Yano, Masashi
    Kamiya, Naoto
    Hiruta, Nobuyuki
    Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 48 (02) : 195 - 199
  • [37] Patient follow-up after radical prostatectomy by internet medical file
    Vallancien, G
    Cathala, N
    Brillat, FO
    Mombet, A
    Lobel, E
    Prapotnich, D
    Alexandre, L
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2002, 186 (07): : 1289 - 1299
  • [38] Time-dependent personalized prognostic analysis by machine learning in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study
    Sato, Kodai
    Sakamoto, Shinichi
    Saito, Shinpei
    Shibata, Hiroki
    Yamada, Yasutaka
    Takeuchi, Nobuyoshi
    Goto, Yusuke
    Tomokazu, Sazuka
    Imamura, Yusuke
    Ichikawa, Tomohiko
    Kawakami, Eiryo
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [39] Salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes in the LAPPRO trial after 8-year follow-up
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Bock, David
    Lantz, Anna
    Angenete, Eva
    Modig, Katarina Koss
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Bjartell, Anders
    Steineck, Gunnar
    Wiklund, Peter
    Haglind, Eva
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 58 (01) : 11 - 19
  • [40] Biochemical outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with follow-up more than 5-years
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Lim, Sey Kiat
    Shin, Tae-Young
    Chung, Byung Ha
    Hong, Sung Joon
    Rha, Koon Ho
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2013, 15 (03) : 404 - 408