Elimination of altered karyotypes by sexual reproduction preserves species identity

被引:50
作者
Heng, Henry H. Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Ctr Mol Med & Genet,Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
关键词
paradox of sex; sexual and asexual reproduction; genome diversity; karyotype and cancer evolution; CCAs and NCCAs; genome and species identity;
D O I
10.1139/G07-039
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Resolving the persistence of sexual reproduction despite its overwhelming costs (known as the paradox of sex) is one of the most persistent challenges of evolutionary biology. In thinking about this paradox, the focus has traditionally been on the evolutionary benefits of genetic recombination in generating offspring diversity and purging deleterious mutations. The similarity of pattern between evolution of organisms and evolution among cancer cells suggests that the asexual process generates more diverse genomes owing to less controlled reproduction systems, while sexual reproduction generates more stable genomes because the sexual process can serve as a mechanism to "filter out" aberrations at the chromosome level. Our reinterpretation of data from the literature strongly supports this hypothesis. Thus, the principal consequence of sexual reproduction is the reduction of drastic genetic diversity at the genome or chromosome level, resulting in the preservation of species identity rather than the provision of evolutionary diversity for future environmental challenges. Genetic recombination does contribute to genetic diversity, but it does so secondarily and within the framework of the chromosomally defined genome.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 524
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Evolution of sex: Why do organisms shuffle their genotypes? [J].
Agrawal, Aneil F. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (17) :R696-R704
[2]   Tumor morphology and phenotypic evolution driven by selective pressure from the microenvironment [J].
Anderson, Alexander R. A. ;
Weaver, Alissa M. ;
Cummings, Peter T. ;
Quaranta, Vito .
CELL, 2006, 127 (05) :905-915
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]   Deleterious transposable elements and the extinction of asexuals [J].
Arkhipova, I ;
Meselson, M .
BIOESSAYS, 2005, 27 (01) :76-85
[5]   Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks [J].
Azevedo, RBR ;
Lohaus, R ;
Srinivasan, S ;
Dang, KK ;
Burch, CL .
NATURE, 2006, 440 (7080) :87-90
[6]   Adaptation shapes patterns of genome evolution on sexual and asexual chromosomes in Drosophila [J].
Bachtrog, D .
NATURE GENETICS, 2003, 34 (02) :215-219
[7]   A dynamic view of sex chromosome evolution [J].
Bachtrog, Doris .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 16 (06) :578-585
[8]   Why sex and recombination? [J].
Barton, NH ;
Charlesworth, B .
SCIENCE, 1998, 281 (5385) :1986-1990
[9]   Bdelloid rotifers revisited [J].
Birky, CW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (09) :2651-2652
[10]   High sperm aneuploidy rate in unselected infertile patients and its relationship with intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome [J].
Calogero, AE ;
De Palma, A ;
Grazioso, C ;
Barone, N ;
Burrello, N ;
Palermo, I ;
Gulisano, A ;
Pafumi, C ;
D'Agata, R .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (07) :1433-1439