How useful is the machine perfusion in liver transplantation? An answer from a national survey

被引:2
作者
Scalera, Irene [1 ]
De Carlis, R. [2 ]
Patrono, D. [3 ]
Gringeri, E. [4 ]
Olivieri, T. [5 ]
Pagano, D. [6 ,7 ]
Lai, Q. [8 ]
Rossi, M. [8 ]
Gruttadauria, S. [6 ,7 ]
Di Benedetto, F. [5 ]
Cillo, U. [4 ]
Romagnoli, R. [3 ]
Lupo, L. G. [1 ]
De Carlis, L. [2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Policlin Bari, Dept Emergency & Organ Transplantat, Hepatobiliary & Liver Transplant Unit, Bari, Italy
[2] ASST Grande Osped Metropolitano Niguarda, Dept Gen Surg & Transplantat, Milan, Italy
[3] Liver Transplant Ctr, AOU Citta Salute & Sci, Gen Surg 2U, Turin, Italy
[4] Univ Hosp Padua, Hepatobiliary Surg & Liver Transplantat Unit, Padua, Italy
[5] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Hepatopancreato Biliary Surg & Liver Transplant Ct, Modena, Italy
[6] IRCCS ISMETT UPMC, Dept Treatment & Study Abdominal Dis & Abdominal T, UPMC, Palermo, Italy
[7] Univ Catania, Dept Surg & Med & Surg Specialties, Catania, Italy
[8] Sapienza Univ Rome, Liver Transplant Unit, Rome, Italy
[9] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Milan, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2022年 / 9卷
关键词
liver donor; machine perfusion; steatosis; early allograft dysfunction; liver transplantation; EARLY ALLOGRAFT DYSFUNCTION; DONOR RISK INDEX; POSTREPERFUSION SYNDROME; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; ORGAN-TRANSPLANTATION; HEPATIC STEATOSIS; ISCHEMIA; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.975150
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Machine perfusion (MP) has been shown worldwide to offer many advantages in liver transplantation, but it still has some gray areas. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the donor risk factors of grafts, perfused with any MP, that might predict an ineffective MP setting and those would trigger post-transplant early allograft dysfunction (EAD). Data from donors of all MP-perfused grafts at six liver transplant centers have been analyzed, whether implanted or discarded after perfusion. The first endpoint was the negative events after perfusion (NegE), which is the number of grafts discarded plus those that were implanted but lost after the transplant. A risk factor analysis for NegE was performed and marginal grafts for MP were identified. Finally, the risk of EAD was analyzed, considering only implanted grafts. From 2015 to September 2019, 158 grafts were perfused with MP: 151 grafts were implanted and 7 were discarded after the MP phase because they did not reach viability criteria. Of 151, 15 grafts were lost after transplant, so the NegE group consisted of 22 donors. In univariate analysis, the donor risk index > 1.7, the presence of hypertension in the medical history, static cold ischemia time, and the moderate or severe macrovesicular steatosis were the significant factors for NegE. Multivariate analysis confirmed that macrosteatosis > 30% was an independent risk factor for NegE (odd ratio 5.643, p = 0.023, 95% confidence interval, 1.27-24.98). Of 151 transplanted patients, 34% experienced EAD and had worse 1- and 3-year-survival, compared with those who did not face EAD (NoEAD), 96% and 96% for EAD vs. 89% and 71% for NoEAD, respectively (p = 0.03). None of the donor/graft characteristics was associated with EAD even if the graft was moderately steatotic or fibrotic or from an aged donor. For the first time, this study shows that macrovesicular steatosis > 30% might be a warning factor involved in the risk of graft loss or a cause of graft discard after the MP treatment. On the other hand, the MP seems to be useful in reducing the donor and graft weight in the development of EAD.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Role of hypothermic machine perfusion in liver transplantation
    Schlegel, Andrea
    Dutkowski, Philipp
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 (06) : 677 - 689
  • [42] Machine perfusion of the liver: applications in transplantation and beyond
    Ceresa, Carlo D. L.
    Nasralla, David
    Pollok, Joerg-Matthias
    Friend, PeterJ
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 19 (03) : 199 - 209
  • [43] Current Techniques and Indications for Machine Perfusion and Regional Perfusion in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation
    Watson, Christopher J. E.
    Gaurav, Rohit
    Butler, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 14 (02)
  • [44] Current review of machine perfusion in liver transplantation from the Japanese perspective
    Noboru Harada
    Tomoharu Yoshizumi
    Masaki Mori
    [J]. Surgery Today, 2022, 52 : 359 - 368
  • [45] Current review of machine perfusion in liver transplantation from the Japanese perspective
    Harada, Noboru
    Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
    Mori, Masaki
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2022, 52 (03) : 359 - 368
  • [46] Hypothermic Oxygenated machine PErfusion for high-risk liver grafts for transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Risbey, Charles W. G.
    Thomas, Charles
    Niu, Anita
    Liu, Ken
    Crawford, Michael
    Pulitano, Carlo
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2024, 48 (10) : 1085 - 1099
  • [47] Machine perfusion techniques for liver transplantation- A meta-analysis of the first seven randomized-controlled trials
    Parente, Alessandro
    Tirotta, Fabio
    Pini, Alessia
    Eden, Janina
    Dondossola, Daniele
    Manzia, Tommaso M.
    Dutkowski, Philipp
    Schlegel, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 79 (05) : 1201 - 1213
  • [48] Standardization is needed in reporting risk and outcomes of machine perfusion in liver transplantation
    Wehrle, Chase J.
    Miller, Charles
    Hashimoto, Koji
    Schlegel, Andrea
    [J]. HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2024, 13 (04) : 709 - 714
  • [49] Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jakubauskas, Matas
    Jakubauskiene, Lina
    Leber, Bettina
    Strupas, Kestutis
    Stiegler, Philipp
    Schemmer, Peter
    [J]. VISCERAL MEDICINE, 2021, : 243 - 254
  • [50] Normothermic machine perfusion for liver transplantation: current state and future directions
    Lindemann, Jessica
    Yu, Jennifer
    Doyle, M. B. Majella
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 29 (03) : 186 - 194