Effect of implant location and operator on the accuracy of implant scans using a combined healing abutment-scan body system

被引:17
作者
Atalay, Sevda
Cakmak, Guelce [1 ]
Donmez, Mustafa Borga [2 ]
Yilmaz, Hakan
Kokat, Ali Murat
Yilmaz, Burak [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Implant Dent, Sch Dent Med, Dept Reconstruct Dent & Gerodontol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Biruni Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Reconstruct Dent & Gerodontol, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Restorat Prevent & Pediat Dent, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Ohio State Univ, Coll Dent, Div Restorat & Prosthet Dent, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Accuracy; Healing abutment-scan body; Intraoral scanner; Trueness; EXPERIENCE; IMPRESSIONS; TECHNOLOGY; TRUENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103855
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the effect of implant location and operator on the accuracy of implant scans conducted with a combined healing abutment-scan body (CHA-SB) system. Material and Methods: A CHA-SB system was fixed on implants at left central incisor, first premolar, and first molar sites in a dentate maxillary model. An industrial optical scanner (ATOS Core 80) was utilized to scan and generate a reference model (RM). The model was scanned by three operators (n = 8) using an intraoral scanner (TRIOS 3). A software (GOM Inspect) was used to superimpose IOS test scans over RM and calculations (distance and angular deviations) were carried out to evaluate the accuracy of the scans. Data were compared with a 2-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests were employed to resolve significant interactions for trueness and precision (alpha = .05). Results: Implant location affected the trueness (P < .001) and the precision (P < .020) (distance and angular deviations). The scans of the implant at the central incisor site had the highest trueness (distance and angular deviations) (P < .016). The scans of the implant at molar site had the lowest precision (distance deviation data) (P < .012). The scans of the implant at premolar site had lower precision (angular deviation data) than the scans of the implant at central incisor site (P = .016). Operators' effect on the accuracy of scans was not significant (P >= .051). Conclusion: Implant location affected the scan accuracy of the combined healing abutment-scan body system. The scans of the implant at central incisor site had high trueness. The posterior the implant location, the lower was the precision of the scans. The accuracy of scans of different operators was similar. Clinical Significance: Higher deviations found in scans of posterior maxilla compared with those in the anterior region may require increased chairside adjustments when crowns are to be fabricated using the scans of the tested healing abutment-scan body system. However, clinical studies are necessary to corroborate the findings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors [J].
Abduo, Jaafar ;
Elseyoufi, Mohamed .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 26 (03) :101-121
[2]   Effect of coded healing abutment height and position on the trueness of digital intraoral implant scans [J].
Batak, Burcu ;
Yilmaz, Burak ;
Shah, Karnik ;
Rathi, Rajat ;
Schimmel, Martin ;
Lang, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (03) :466-472
[3]   Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study [J].
Braian, Michael ;
Wennerberg, Ann .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 122 (02) :129-136
[4]   The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans [J].
Cakmak, Gulce ;
Yilmaz, Hakan ;
Trevino, Alejandro ;
Kokat, Ali Murat ;
Yilmaz, Burak .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (04) :533-541
[5]   Trueness of Intraoral Scanners Considering Operator Experience and Three Different Implant Scenarios: A Preliminary Report [J].
Canullo, Luigi ;
Colombo, Marco ;
Menini, Maria ;
Sorge, Patrizia ;
Pesce, Paolo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2021, 34 (02) :250-253
[6]  
Ender A, 2019, INT J COMPUT DENT, V22, P11
[7]   ACCURACY OF COMPLETE-ARCH DENTAL IMPRESSIONS: A NEW METHOD OF MEASURING TRUENESS AND PRECISION [J].
Ender, Andreas ;
Mehl, Albert .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 109 (02) :121-128
[8]   Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Active Triangulation Technology With Blue Light for Implants: Effect of Clinically Relevant Parameters [J].
Gimenez, Beatriz ;
Oezcan, Mutlu ;
Martinez-Rus, Francisco ;
Pradies, Guillermo .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (05) :498-504
[9]   Accuracy of Two Digital Implant Impression Systems Based on Confocal Microscopy with Variations in Customized Software and Clinical Parameters [J].
Gimenez, Beatriz ;
Pradies, Guillermo ;
Martinez-Rus, Francisco ;
Oezcan, Mutlu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (01) :56-64
[10]   Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Parallel Confocal Laser Technology for Implants with Consideration of Operator Experience and Implant Angulation and Depth [J].
Gimenez, Beatriz ;
Oezcan, Mutlu ;
Martinez-Rus, Francisco ;
Pradies, Guillermo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (04) :853-862