A Direct Comparison Approach for Testing Measurement Invariance

被引:172
作者
Cheung, Gordon W. [1 ]
Lau, Rebecca S. [2 ]
机构
[1] CUHK, Dept Management, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Open Univ Hong Kong, Dept Management, Ho Man Tin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
measurement equivalence/invariance; factor-ratio test; latent mean comparisons; bootstrapping; structural equation modeling; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; FACTOR-ANALYTIC TESTS; OF-FIT INDEXES; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; FACTORIAL INVARIANCE; EQUIVALENCE; SENSITIVITY; MEDIATION; PRODUCT;
D O I
10.1177/1094428111421987
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Measurement equivalence/invariance (ME/I) is a condition that should be met before meaningful comparisons of survey results across groups can be made. As an alternative to the likelihood ratio test (LRT), the change in comparative fit index (Delta CFI) rules of thumb, and the modification index (MI), this teaching note demonstrates the procedures for establishing bias-corrected (BC) bootstrap confidence intervals for testing ME/I. Unlike the LRT and Delta CFI methods, which need a different model estimation per item, the BC bootstrap confidence intervals approach can examine item-level ME/I tests using a single model. This method greatly simplifies the search for an invariant item as the reference indicator in the factor-ratio test. Also demonstrated here is how the factor-ratio test and the list-and-delete method can be extended from the metric invariance test to the scalar invariance test. Finally, the BC bootstrap confidence interval procedures for comparing uniqueness variances, factor variances, factor covariances, and latent means across groups are shown.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 198
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   THE EFFECT OF SAMPLING ERROR ON CONVERGENCE, IMPROPER SOLUTIONS, AND GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDEXES FOR MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1984, 49 (02) :155-173
[2]  
Bollen K.A., 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables
[3]   CRITICAL COMMENTS ON APPLYING COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELING [J].
BRANNICK, MT .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1995, 16 (03) :201-213
[4]   TESTING FOR THE EQUIVALENCE OF FACTOR COVARIANCE AND MEAN STRUCTURES - THE ISSUE OF PARTIAL MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE [J].
BYRNE, BM ;
SHAVELSON, RJ ;
MUTHEN, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (03) :456-466
[5]   The Conceptualization and Analysis of Change Over Time: An Integrative Approach Incorporating Longitudinal Mean and Covariance Structures Analysis (LMACS) and Multiple Indicator Latent Growth Modeling (MLGM) [J].
Chan, David .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 1998, 1 (04) :421-483
[6]   Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance [J].
Chen, Fang Fang .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (03) :464-504
[7]  
Cheung G.W., 2004, Journal of Hospitality Tourism Research, V28, P375
[8]  
Cheung G.W., 1998, APPL BEHAV SCI REV, V6, P93, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1068-8595(99)80006-3, DOI 10.1016/S1068-8595(99)80006-3, 10.1016/S1068-8595(99)80006-3]
[9]   Testing equivalence in the structure, means, and variances of higher-order constructs with structural equation modeling [J].
Cheung, Gordon W. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2008, 11 (03) :593-613
[10]   Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables - Bootstrapping with structural equation models [J].
Cheung, Gordon W. ;
Lau, Rebecca S. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2008, 11 (02) :296-325